The early extraction of mandibular primary canines will provide some

relief of permanent incisor crowding; however, arch perimeter and arch width

will both decrease, ultimately leaving less room for eruption of the permanent canines.

you can deploy Copilot The interceptive extraction of primary canines is a topic of debate among orthodontists. Some studies suggest that removing primary canines can help improve the alignment of crowded incisors in the short term. However, the long-term benefits are less clear, and there is a possibility that the crowding may simply shift to other areas of the mouth.

A systematic review found that the extraction of primary canines might provide some benefit in reducing incisor irregularity, but the evidence is not strong enough to make a definitive conclusion. More high-quality studies with long-term follow-up are needed to fully understand the impact of this intervention.

https://kevinobrienorthoblog.com/interceptive-extraction-primary-mandibular-canines-marginal/

https://kevinobrienorthoblog.com/interceptive-removal-of-primary-canines/

https://repository.mbru.ac.ae/mbru_server/api/core/bitstreams/8458c278-2f3f-48f4-b2b9-9d653c63c1ef/content

You're right. The early extraction of mandibular primary canines can indeed provide some relief for permanent incisor crowding. However, this approach can lead to a decrease in arch perimeter and arch width, which may ultimately leave less room for the eruption of the permanent canines.

It's a bit of a trade-off, and the decision to proceed with this treatment should be carefully considered with the guidance of an orthodontist. They can provide a personalized assessment based on the specific dental and orthodontic needs of the patient.

Good luck