A topological space $X$ is defined to have *countable discrete cellularity* if each discrete family of open subsets of $X$ is at most countable.

A family $\mathcal F$ of subsets of a topological space $X$ is called *discrete* if each point $x\in X$ has a neighborhood $O_x\subset X$ that intersects at most one set $F\in\mathcal F$.

It is easy to see that a Tychonoff space $X$ has countable discrete cellularity if and only if for any continuous map $f:X\to M$ to a metric space $M$ the image $f(X)$ is separable.

A topological group $G$ is *$\omega$-narrow* if for any neighborhood $U$ of the unit there exists a countable subset $C\subset G$ such that $G=C\cdot U$. By a classical theorem of Guran, a topological group is $\omega$-narrow if and only if $G$ is topologically isomorphic to a subgroup of a Tychonoff product of metrizable separable topological groups.

It is easy to see that a topological group is $\omega$-narrow if it has countable discrete cellularity. What about the converse?

>**Problem 1.** Does every $\omega$-narrow topological group have countable discrete cellularity?

This problem can also be asked for uniform spaces. A uniform space $(X,\mathcal U)$ is *$\omega$-narrow* if for any entouage $U\in\mathcal U$ there exists a countable set $C\subset X$ such that for every $x\in X$ there exists $c\in C$ with $(c,x)\in U$. It can be shown that a uniform space is $\omega$-narrow if it has countable discrete cellularity. What about the converse?

>**Problem 2.** Does every $\omega$-narrow uniform space have countable discrete cellularity?

More Taras Banakh's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions