I have been looking for a reference for a long time, and I am annoyed that I cannot find it again. Perhaps someone on this list could help me...

     About 30 years ago, I remember reading an article, by a British scientist if I recall correctly, talking about soil maps. The author said that soil maps without a well-defined practical purpose don't make a lot of sense. He (or she?) discussed the example of a soil map useful to a fisherman. That map only needs to have two classes: soils with earthworms and soils without earthworms...

      I have always thought that this paper was right, in so many ways... And for the last few years, I have tried desperately to find it again, to cite it in a reflection on the usefulness of soil maps that I would like to write... We seem to spend so much time and energy making maps, including now digital maps, and so little time thinking about what information soil maps should contain to be useful, or what precise purpose maps serve. As a result, most of the information that current soil maps provide is almost entirely useless or misleading for a wide range of situations... 

Anyway, if someone could tell me what the reference to this article is, I would be eternally grateful.

Similar questions and discussions