Yes, there are several robust methods for assessing the socio-ecological vulnerability of a watershed, combining both biophysical and socio-economic indicators. One widely used approach is the development of a Socio-Ecological Vulnerability Index (SEVI) that integrates data such as land use/land cover, slope, climate exposure, water availability, as well as social aspects like population density, livelihood dependency, and institutional capacity. Tools like GIS-based multi-criteria analysis (MCA) and Principal Component Analysis (PCA) are often applied for weighting and spatial representation.

If you're considering a more tailored and operational assessment—especially in the context of planning, adaptation, or integrated watershed management—our team at FACOP (Formation et Consultation Professionnelles) would be happy to collaborate. We bring together expertise in environmental assessment, stakeholder engagement, and training to support robust, field-adapted vulnerability assessments.

Feel free to reach out if you're interested in co-developing a methodology or exploring potential project-based collaboration.

Lamboni Payéne

Assessing the socio-ecological vulnerability of a watershed requires an integrated approach that combines ecological, social, and economic factors, utilizing methods such as multi-criteria analysis (MCA), GIS technologies, and vulnerability indicators. The robustness of this assessment is enhanced by involving local communities through participatory methods and applying models like the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP), which enable spatial analysis and identification of key vulnerabilities. Given the specificity and complexity of each watershed, there is no universal method, but a multidisciplinary and holistic approach allows for accurate problem identification and the development of effective strategies for sustainable water resource management.