reports of(The Global Innovation Index) from 2014 to 2017, As well as the following references :
Tin, K. L. (2005). Measuring innovation performance. Singapore: Information Services Division, National Library Board. 1-13.
...........................
Han, I. F (2012). A Study of the Relationship between Intellectual Capital and Innovation Performance Based on Complexity Theory. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Hong Kong: Polytechnic University.
.......................
Gloet, M; Terziovski, T (2004). Exploring the relationship between knowledge management practices and innovation performance. Emerald Group: Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 15(5), 402-409.
..................................
Darroch, J; McNaughton, R (2002). Examining the link between knowledge management practices and types of innovation. Emerald Group: Journal of Intellectual Capital, 3(3), 210-222.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>.........................
Dutta, S (2011). The Global Innovation Index 2011: Accelerating Growth and Development. Report GII Available on the Link: https://www.globalinnovationindex.org.
....................
Dutta, S (2012). The Global Innovation Index 2012: Stonger Innovation Linkages for Global Growth. Report GII Available on the Link: https://www.globalinnovationindex.org.
................
Dutta, S; Lanvin, B (2013). The Global Innovation Index 2013: The Local Dynamics of Innovation. Report GII Available on the Link: https://www.globalinnovationindex.org.
................
Dutta, S; Lanvin, B; Vincent, W.S (2014). The Global Innovation Index 2014: The Human Factor in Innovation. Report GII Available on the Link: https://www.globalinnovationindex.org.
..................
Dutta, S; Lanvin, B; Vincent, W.S (2015). The Global Innovation Index 2015: Effective Innovation Policies for Development. Report GII Available on the Link: https://www.globalinnovationindex.org.
Is the object to gauge how friendly a workplace environment is to innovation? (The dimensions of a workplace's friendliness to innovation include leadership, the diversity of leadership styles, the work group, the psychological environment, the physical work space, procedures for bringing in outsiders or outside perspectives, ways to promote group convergence, etc.)
Is the object to gauge the process of innovation? (Process metrics deal with variables that affect the transfer of ideas through the innovation funnel, e.g., average time from idea approval to implementation, number of ideas approved and number implemented, stage-gate pass rates, value of the innovation pipeline, etc.)
Is the object to gauge the outcome of innovation? (Innovation results are difficult to quantify because they often benefit from the fruition of earlier ideas and projects in the innovation pipeline and may lean on expansion of innovation capacity due to earlier ideas and projects.)
reports of(The Global Innovation Index) from 2014 to 2017, As well as the following references :
Tin, K. L. (2005). Measuring innovation performance. Singapore: Information Services Division, National Library Board. 1-13.
...........................
Han, I. F (2012). A Study of the Relationship between Intellectual Capital and Innovation Performance Based on Complexity Theory. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Hong Kong: Polytechnic University.
.......................
Gloet, M; Terziovski, T (2004). Exploring the relationship between knowledge management practices and innovation performance. Emerald Group: Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 15(5), 402-409.
..................................
Darroch, J; McNaughton, R (2002). Examining the link between knowledge management practices and types of innovation. Emerald Group: Journal of Intellectual Capital, 3(3), 210-222.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>.........................
Dutta, S (2011). The Global Innovation Index 2011: Accelerating Growth and Development. Report GII Available on the Link: https://www.globalinnovationindex.org.
....................
Dutta, S (2012). The Global Innovation Index 2012: Stonger Innovation Linkages for Global Growth. Report GII Available on the Link: https://www.globalinnovationindex.org.
................
Dutta, S; Lanvin, B (2013). The Global Innovation Index 2013: The Local Dynamics of Innovation. Report GII Available on the Link: https://www.globalinnovationindex.org.
................
Dutta, S; Lanvin, B; Vincent, W.S (2014). The Global Innovation Index 2014: The Human Factor in Innovation. Report GII Available on the Link: https://www.globalinnovationindex.org.
..................
Dutta, S; Lanvin, B; Vincent, W.S (2015). The Global Innovation Index 2015: Effective Innovation Policies for Development. Report GII Available on the Link: https://www.globalinnovationindex.org.
www.bpir.com has a self-assessment instrument that measures organizing for innovation in the public sector. The source is the C-CAR Model Canada School of Public Service that was developed by the Canadian Centre for Management Development, Canada School of Public Service.
The C-CAR model was created to provide a simple, practical and effective way to better organize teams for innovation. By deliberately organizing teams to take account of the following C-CAR characteristics (Common Purpose, Creative Ideas, Applicability, Results), their potential to generate innovative ideas that work can be maximized.
This self-assessment will help determine your innovation readiness, and provide you with a strong and strategic rationale for taking targeted actions to strengthen your innovation capacity.
Organizational innovation can be measured with a seven-item scale with two dimensions of innovation performance including administrative and technical innovation by Chen and Huang (2009), but originally developed by Ibarra (1993). Chen, C. J., & Huang, J. W. 2009. Strategic human resource practices and innovation performance -The mediating role of knowledge management capacity. Journal of business research, 62, 104-114.
Besides good references presented above enclosed please find an article which contains in the appendix a simplistic but properly validated questionnaire to measure some innovations (including organizational ones). The major idea of that instruments is to get the subjective perception of managers on how difficult is to design and to implement particular innovations.