Dear RG members
Some RG members have a considerable high RG score, however they do not have great number of publications and citations.
what is your opinion?
what is the suitable criteria to calculate the RG-Score?
In this moment its look like fake score but in the nearst time i think it will be index to activity of scintific research, in last five year we can touch the devolpement day per day and now it consider one of the top three scintific community in internet
Dear Friends and Colleagues of RG
Yes, this is an interesting issue. I noticed that more and more Research Gate users are asking about this issue recently. The algorithm of counting and assessing the scientific activity of individual scientists, researchers of Research Gate portal users is interesting. Many users of the RG portal wonder what the essence of the formula is. Has any of you studied scientifically and / or wrote scientific publications in this area? The topic is interesting, this is confirmed by the present discussion, which is attended by many scientists representing various scientific environments.
Best wishes
I admit some incredibly high scores have made me think there must be a way of faking them.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Cognitive Science
- Thinking