One of the most factors to keep researcher in touch with the latest version of his own scientific topic is PERIODIC UPDATE, and the active example or improvement to this statement is our existence as a researchers in such academic platform of course including RG community.
Thank you very much Dr. Liqaa for your important question.
Yes! Researchers' skills need to be updated periodically, as the requirements and thrust of research changes with change in time.
How requirement is changing and so, researchers' skills are required, may see as under:
The Vitae Researcher Development Framework (RDF) is a comprehensive guide to the array of skills required to do and support research in various professional capacities as well as to work with others and ensure the wider impacts of research.
The University of Adelaide uses the RDF to support HDR students in identifying the knowledge, skills, and behaviours required to be an effective researcher and enhance their employability skills.
The Researcher Development Framework is designed for researchers at all levels and you may find not all parts of it are relevant to you – but it will help you think about the full range of skills you will need to:
--succeed in your research degree
--achieve your longer-term personal and professional goals
Researchers (need to) update their skills with each new research project they embark on. Being willing and able to update one's research skills is an essential part of one's competence as a researcher.
Research aptitude improves with practice and skill. In the dynamic world of research skill is changing very fast. Updating domain specific skill also make a researcher more equipped in conducting research. Upgradation of knowledge in software and hardware make things better scientifically.
Yes. How can you be a researcher if you are not updated on what other researchers are publishing? The only way of being a good researcher is to put your information update otherwise you will be a museum !
Competitveness comes with Professional Development. Being a dynamic individual requires updating herself with content knowledge, update on skills with the new one, and the attitude to see things with a dynamic enegrgy towards continuing professioanl development.
All knowledge and skills need constant updating due to the rapid development of all sciences
There is a simple evidence that older doctors are true to have experience but do not have the skills to deal with diseases that have developed themselves because of drugs and do not have the skills to deal with disease detection devices only through training and continuous development
it is an important stepping. You will also lay important groundwork , and gain experience you will be able to draw on for the rest of your working life.
NO RESEARCHER IS A KNOW ALL. Therefore, researchers must continually avail themselves to new research skills that would ENHANCE THEIR RESEARCH ABILITIES for them to produce practical and result-oriented studies that would advance the progress of communities.
A HUMBLE researcher, who is ALWAYS PREPARED TO LEARN soon becomes very knowledgeable in the new methodologies and approaches that work better and yield excellent findings.
Grasping opportunities to partake in research courses whether it is basic or not, attending workshops and seminars on research would afford researchers the wonderful privilege of REVISING THE KNOWLEDGE THEY ALREADY LEARNT WHICH THEY MIGHT HAVE FORGOTTEN, LEARN MODERN SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS that makes analysis of data stress free and free of errors.
Indeed, EVERY RESEARCHER whether AMATEUR or EXPERIENCED must cease EVERY OPPORTUNITY to UPGRADE THEMSELVES in RESEARCH not just PERIODICALLY but CONTINUALLY as and when the opportunity presents itself.
Researchers' skills are necessary to be updated progressively when the need arises as this will ensure that we are in touch with the literature related to our niche areas,
"Indeed, EVERY RESEARCHER whether AMATEUR or EXPERIENCED must cease EVERY OPPORTUNITY to UPGRADE THEMSELVES in RESEARCH not just PERIODICALLY but CONTINUALLY as and when the opportunity presents itself ".
Researchers abilities need to be tested periodically in order to at least remember the main steps of writing a research paper. I think the following link may be useful for you.
You are absolutely right that researchers' skills need to be trained and updated periodically at least to refresh the main ideas of researching as some writers stay a long time without any production. I read the link you shared and I like to say thank you so much for your efforts.
Yes, they absolutely need to be updated from time to time and other teaching skills are also need to be modern and innovative not only the researching ones.
According to Sekaran (2003) research is an organized, systematic, critical, scientific inquiry or investigation into a specific problem, undertaken with the objective of finding answers or solutions thereto.
Everyday new problems arise in the world and the researchers have to conduct new research in order to find the solutions. Therefore researchers' skills need to be updated periodically. Otherwise it’s like drinking water from an old stale pond.
Reference
Sekaran, U., 2003. Research methods for business: A skill building approach. John Wiley & Sons.
An active researcher's knowledge and skills are updated continually. One cannot engage successfully with any research project if they do not complete a literature review (thus update and expand their knowledge on the subject under research) or design their research methodology according to what the relevant literature advise (thus potentially updating their skills on methods and tools for data collection and analysis).
With the above in mind, ideally your question is not necessary.
Yes, it is a continuous process of improvement ... to provide a systematic approach to attract and employ staff skills. Developing and dealing with them as a continuous process
Skill is the ability, skill and ingenuity of the researcher in dealing with a subject according to what he gets and developing his training and experience during the years of his life.
From my personal experience ( in India), I think that there MUST be periodical upgradation and EVALUATION program for not only of researchers, but of all levels of teachers and administrators with arrangement of rewards and punishment.
It is not easy to start for the persons in high chairs with high powers without minimum quality, but it is the ONLY way to build any third world nation like India in actual sense.
The skill of dealing with professors belonging to different schools of thought, and their views and visions of different.
When the researcher chooses a subject for his thesis and before preparing his plan, he will consult with the professors and find that they have different or contradictory visions. This may happen when presenting his plan to the seminar. Getting out of this problem is as follows:
A- isten to all views and absorbed.
B - The formation of a special vision that takes into account the closest views of the researcher's thought.
C - defend this view and stick to it and make the utmost effort to convince others. This skill is linked to the skill of good presentation.
To keep up with the latest techniques and trends in the field. When i went to school we used a microscope to physically count cells in hematology and it would take a long time to establish a full blood count in clinical pathology. Nowadays the process is now fully automated and the answer in available in a minute. To cope with this new technology i just need to go to a conference or read a publication and be able to use and understand the new state of affairs in the field
Dealing skill calculated accurately in the relationship of the researcher with the original supervisor and co-supervisor.
Some researchers are dealing with the original supervisor and co-supervisor in a matter of distrust in it, and that the researcher must be careful to be dealing with the co-supervisor with the knowledge of the original supervisor and not to move between the two professors of supervisors in a matter of suspicion. He loses both .
...To develop the professionalism of the professor through continuous training in order to keep up with the latest technologies and trends in the field of applied research .
Learning skills and acquiring new knowledge is a life long process. It just does not stop after you have reached a research milestone in your career. In fact, the moment a person thinks he/she has learned everything there is to know, they have shut themselves off from new possibilities and adventures.
The researcher's information and skill must be update continuously due to the rapid improvement in the science techniques and the communication technologies.
One is the daily work a researcher perform and thereby should deepen already acquired skills or make it more broad in the researchers domain.
Otherwise it would not be much of a research.
The other angle is to step out of your own domain to acquire new skills which I see very fruitful for any researcher. Cross over domain research is usually very beneficial as it opens up new ways of reasoning and thinking.
But is is a matter of time and interest how to ensure your own skills as a reseracher...
Yes, a researcher has to enlarge his knowledge and skills. In modern competitive business and education environment, new knowledge appears in new specific domains, but also in interdisciplinary domains. New projects and collaboration also require new skills, and ask for new type of researcher who is a specialist in several domains (not all at the same level) or at least has to be well acquainted with several other domains, including knowledge and skills...