It really depends on your expectations and what you want to achieve at the conference. You could have several motivations like presenting something because you have promised it in a proposal, meeting old friends and catching up with them, engaging stakeholders that you could not approach in a different situation, meeting the great names in your field.
If you make sure that the conference will be able to provide you with what you expect, then they are a good thing - if not, they might be a waste of money and time.
One must be very selective to choose conferences that there will be both learning and sharing of technology and ideas. Atendees must work to get the most out by attending pertinent presentations, interacting with topical researchers, asking questions and when possible discussing with others or delivery of presentations of their meaningful works. More opportunities for low cost, online interactions and webinars in todays world. My favorite conference was the International Erosion Control Association. Their annual conference is relatively low cost, includes various profssional training, certifications, and sharing of technical papers, and time for professional vendors sharing equipment types, supplies useful for erosion and sediment control. It is important to find a good example as opportunity and funds are typically limited. http://www.ieca.org/IECA/IECA_Events/2019_Annual_Conference.aspx
It really depends on your expectations and what you want to achieve at the conference. You could have several motivations like presenting something because you have promised it in a proposal, meeting old friends and catching up with them, engaging stakeholders that you could not approach in a different situation, meeting the great names in your field.
If you make sure that the conference will be able to provide you with what you expect, then they are a good thing - if not, they might be a waste of money and time.
That is very true colleagues the main aims for conferences are to follow the new knowledge and technologies in your field in a part. In another part, its nice to meet old friends and lecturers taught you sometimes over your study.
However, most conferences are overpriced and you have to drop thousands of dollars for no benefits.
In addition, they always try to repeat the previous subjects and all are repetitive.
Furthermore, you will face plenty of weak presentations and speakers.
In conclusion, you at the end find out its not worth to attend and spending all these expenses and you might find what you want at the local specific meetings.
There are some really prestigious conferences and some really bad journals. Good conferences provide opportunities to meet and explore collaborations with other scholars. In my filed, ASCE holds some really great conferences.
Usehful for young scientists to get the lay of the research land they will be trodding through for their careers in scientific research in many of its aspects.
conferences are an opportunity to meet colleagues and to update information in the area of interest, any conference that miss these things is of no benefit.
No waste of fund in attending conferences/workshops either local or international. However, hundreds of conferences will not do good if experience gained in attending are not put to use or your impact as attendee does not felt by your colleagues. Application of such will be encouraging to your sponsors and colleagues and even to the organizers,
I think most of the academic conferences are organized with the specific objective of dissemination of knowledge (may be some organized with the objective of business). Conference matters for a scientist/researcher.
A conference is not just an avenue for a scientist to present their research to the wider community, but it can be an important venue for brainstorming, networking and making vital connections that can lead to new initiatives, papers and funding, in a way that virtual, online meetings cannot. This is why conferences matter.
No, no, no...as long as they do the business of conferencing, presenting and sharing ideas; as long as the presentations address the themes and sub themes, conferences would always be just great.
Conferences are generally platforms for academic and research training and experience. Of course, there are always counterfeits of everything, including conferences. All we need to do is to select the good conferences whose focus is not on monetary gains but rather on academic grooming and research enhancement.
Conferences are academic exercises that should not be neglected as there's always something new to learn (depending on the approach of the attendee) no matter how minute the learning experience would seem.
It has definitely become a market of ideas and payments, just like the publishing sector. We have to build our own value preferences and select carefully; in principle, I cannot detect a waste of resources. Bringing people together and sharing scientific ideas is an important gateway for advancing research. So, I am in line with Anuradha Iddagoda .
Generally speaking, conferences are assemblies of the learned people who argue about particular topics aiming to highlight the latest developments of the field to which they belong. By attending conferences where interesting topics about various realities of life are prioritized themes, scholars can get exposed to new information and better ways of conducting research. However, we have to be selective in attending conferences because researchers and practitioners hope to improve their insights through continuous professional and skill development- objectives that can only be achieved by attending high quality conferences.
The basic purpose of a conference is to interact with so many learned colleagues and to discuss a particular topic in detail. If conference is being taken in positive sense then it can significantly change the research scenario. But these days every activity is becoming a business and business in terms of money.
This depends upon Discipline, funding Agency, Topic, Directors academic background and capability, Institution environment and participants involvement and interest.
Conference on a particular area of subject is quite interesting and knowledge sharing platform. We learn new ideas and thoughts by interactions with so many intellectual people.
There are useful and wasteful conferences. You can not generalize the quality of conferences. It is business for some and service (disseminating and sharing of knowledge) for some. There are also different objectives as indicated by Dr. Benni, while one attends the conferences. Any way it is a good question.
The task of the conferences is to organize the communication of scientists and the exchange of knowledge. Sometimes this is successful, sometimes it does not give quick results. Much depends on the organizers and the composition of scientists. For discussion it is necessary to invite scientists with opposing views on solving a scientific problem. Usually breakthrough solutions appear on the fields of the conference, when scientists communicate in an informal setting.
The prepared and coordinated conferences will reflect an excellent impression and higher sense of responsibility leading to a dense participation whenever it will be held.
indeed, most conferences have become money making ventures. where ethical considerations are no longer considered. some conference managers aims more on profits realizable from conferees, to the extent that what ever one submits or presents is accepted provided that one pays. But truly, conferences are genuine ground for academic interaction, avenue for new idea and technique dissemination outside classroom works, network building and professional socialization. Unfortunately, a very few gave me such out of the ones I have attended.I believe ethical considerations should be spelt more on this to streamline the right actions
I agree with Dr. Shaheen, that like some conferences there are also some journals where prime objective is to "make" money, ignoring the quality of scientific content to great extent.
Thanks Dr. Asit for providing a very interesting & educative article which will be quite useful to the young researchers. I liked the concluding statement "The benefits are definitely bigger than the costs if you know how to get the most out of every conference".
Yes, Dr. N B Narasimha Prasad - the concluding remark "The benefits are definitely bigger than the costs if you know how to get the most out of every conference" tells about the benefits of attending conference in one sentence. I totally agree with this statement. Thanks and regards
Most of conferences are in general a waste of time, money and productive man hours. Most are organised by professional conference organizers whose main purpose is profit making.
not always, although, the researchers paid a lot of money , but they gain experience and they have good chance for meeting others and discussing technical issues, and may have good chance to have fund for thier research.
Most academic conferences, like so many academic institutions of higher education have become "profit driven." Just as some universities will accept any and all applicants and collect the tuition fees, some conferences will accept any abstract. All they're interested in is the registration fee. Someone needs to compile a list of such predatory conferences and predatory universities.
That's an interesting question that you posed. I agree with Sharaf Rehman that if conferences are about making money, this is a reflection of some of the trends that are taking place in academia globally. However, I also think what Benni Thiebes says is important - you need to think about your own reasons for going to confs and try and benefit from them regardless of their own motives. Confs are a good place to disseminate your work, interact with others about it and find out what other people are doing.
Not only the conferences, but there is also a list of journals who ask for a significant amount of money to publish your articles. They claim that their journals are peer-reviewed, but they never send the papers to the reviewer, nor they have the relevant reviewers to make some rational comment or suggestions on the research. A few weeks back, I encountered a journal which asked me for two thousand and five hundred euro for publishing my article. After I refused, they started insisting for bargaining such as 'how much could you pay' etc.
I've had a similar experience as Profesor Musa Khan. I shut them up by asking them how much they'll pay me for publishing my work? That ended the conversation in a hurry. My suggestion is to seek out conferences that are arranged by the universities and their departments and seek out journals produced by the universities. Their goal is not profit but to attract international scholars and research of substance. Some of the universities in eastern Europe have some highly respected and quality journals - publications that value and welcome quality research.
Unfortunately "science" - as far as the publications and conferences are concerned - with rare exceptions became the part of business. Too big conferences are good almost for nothing, with 5-6 or more parallel section syou cannot meet people, and, at best, if you are not a panel speaker, you will have 10 attentdants maximum. In spite of these disadvantages you may meet interesting people and establish useful contatcs. Everything depends on whether you finance it yourselt or you have an institution behind you to pay the costs. On private basis it is definitely too expensive.