Hi all, in trying to maintain a scientist-practitioner approach, I am hopefull you can advise me of peer reviewed outcome studies of this approach to treating voice hearers? I was recently asked some questions about the "Maastricht" approach and used good ole "google" to get some information. However, I could not locate outcome studies. Will appreciate assistance. Thanks.
Look in PsycINFO or Google Scholar and search for "auditory hallucinations" and include the word Maastrict. I found these citations for starters:
Corstens, D., Escher, S., & Romme, M. (2008). Accepting and working with voices: The Maastricht approach. In A. Moskowitz, I. Schäfer, M. J. Dorahy (Eds.) , Psychosis, trauma and dissociation: Emerging perspectives on severe psychopathology (pp. 319-332). Wiley-Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9780470699652.ch23
Escher, S. (2012). Useful instruments for exploring hearing voices and paranoia. In M. Romme, S. Escher (Eds.) , Psychosis as a personal crisis: An experience-based approach (pp. 45-58). New York, NY, US: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
Sapey, B., & Bullimore, P. (2013). Listening to voice hearers. Journal of Social Work, 13(6), 616-632. .
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Medicine
- Counseling Psychology