Any such reason entails no direct connection between the reason and actions for which it is a reason (for example, reasons generated by the mere fact that someone in authority has given an order).
No , I don't , accountability is content -dependent so if reasons don't make sense or add up then there are no liabilities ....
For carrying out orders , there need not be reasons , then who devises the plan needs to held accountable or the one who has carried out the job else the world will have jungle law Prof ....
As a scholar, I am a great thinker and I cant just do things out of will. Many persons would be more propelled to listen through reasoning and not just action-instructive. I think civilized societies must desist from the authoritarian view of the world in such a harsh, unexplained fashion.
The tenacity of motives should ideally be related to content; otherwise, he would fall into a crude, perverse and authoritarian tenacity. Even more so if the motives are not praiseworthy and are not mediated by moral values and ethical principles.
La tenacidad de los motivos idealmente deberían de estar relacionados con los contenidos; de no ser así, se caería en una tenacidad grosera, perversa y autoritaria. Con mayor razón si los motivos no son loables y no están mediados por valores morales y principios éticos.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Philosophy
- Ethics