I haven't used the polymer you mention, but I've used another conductive polymer branded "e-spacer", to do EBL on dielectric substrates. E spacer doesn't require baking after spin coat. After the EBL writing, e spacer can be removed in DI water before developing the underlying PMMA.
Thank you for your answers. I am currently facing the adhesion issue between PMMA and PEDOT, the PEDOT is not wetting the surface and hence not coating
The wetting of AquaSAVE to PMMA is modarate, so sometimes I have quite nicely coated samples, sometimes just in the middle (where I need that and where I put the initial drop)...try some fast O2 plasma or ozone treatment (but really short) prior to PEDOT coating...
If you can obtain E-spacer, you should try it. It is expensive, so it may be prudent to obtain a sample from your colleagues if they have one and test it out first. I have spin-coated it on baked PMMA A4/A6 at ~2000 rpm, and the adhesion was fine. The dielectric substrate was mica, and I was able to get pretty decent EBL features (few hundred nm) with a moderate dose (~360 μC/cm^2 @ 20kV).
Are you trying to use the conductive polymer solely for the purposes of EBL on dielectric substrates?
Hi Pankaj Sethi , are you solved the problem with the PEDOT on PMMA?. Becouse I have the same problem. The PEDOT don't wetting the surface of the PMMA.
Have you tried O2 plasma on the PMMA /Si before applying the PEDOT:PSS? Just be mindful that excess plasma treatment may remove your PMMA film completely. A few seconds may improve the adhesion between PEDOT:PSS and PMMA.
PEDOT:PSS Clevios HTL Solar should have better wettability than PEDOT:PSS Clevios PH 1000, at the price of less conductivity. (0.0012 Ω.cm vs 1 - 10 Ω.cm ).
The conductivity of PEDOT:PSS Clevios HTL Solar seems to be close to Espacer EP300 (0.7 S/cm).