The internal energy+All potential energies of a stopped material object( without a Kinetic energy) = the energy needed to make this object lonely in the absolut vacuum of 0 Kelvin where nothing can move.
Obviously in the absolut vacuum , this object will be destroyed since no particles can move !
To me, The photons of light lose their energy till they stop near the event horizon of the Blackholes since our detectors could prove that the temperature near the event horizon is nearly equal to 0 Kelvin. Hence, the light isn't only deviated and totally absorbed by blackholes.
And WE should remark that the ejections from The two poles of balckholes prove that there is no infinite Gravity around the blackhole .
Dear Akram Louiz ,
The photons of light lose their energy till they stop near the event horizon of the Blackholes since our detectors could prove that the temperature near the event horizon is nearly equal to 0 Kelvin.
Interesting, but I have never seen any such claim, can you give a reference?
JES
Dear Stellan Gustafsson
2.7 Kelvin has been detected from earth near blackholes.
Please read this article: Article Absolute Zero Occurs in Black Holes
Stellan Gustafsson You can also read this article: https://phys.org/news/2016-09-cold-black-holes.html
Tony Yuan
Yes I agree and I think that even the singleton has no infinite gravity. It is a very big dense mass spinning at an extraordinary speed and hidden by its event horizon.
As an engineer, whenever I get an answer of infinity then I know I've made a mistake somewhere. With black hole theory when physicists reached an answer of infinity (i.e. the singularity at the event horizon), they confirmed that nobody had made a mistake with the mathematics and then continued with the conclusion that this singularity (and that of further singularities when they mathematically probed inside black holes) were somehow correct. Black hole theory has collapsed in to mathematical, imaginary conclusions arrived at from an earlier possible divide by zero error.
Physics has not questioned the validity of assumptions they have made in reaching the conclusions of singularities. Specifically they have not considered that their assumption that the fundamental physical dimensions being linear mass, length & time might be invalid. How can mathematical theories about black holes derived from an assumption that time is linear and fundamental be expected to be correct if there were actually a direction to time?
I am convinced that it is this misconception of the fundamental nature of linear mass, length & time which is what is creating all of the problems and issues with modern physics.
I tried designing a new fundamental dimensional model. Starting again, from that new fundamental dimensional model plus a universal fabric based on that dimensional framework, I reached a possible solution where everything in the universe can be explained as bubbles and waves of (and in) this universal fabric. From this theory, all particles are explained as bubbles of this fabric. The "particles" of the Standard model physics creates when splitting an atom are just smaller bubbles with waves of different directions travelling in different directions of time.
Everything in physics I consider based on an assumption of this new dimensional framework makes much, much more sense. No Big bang is necessary to create matter. These bubbles can form anywhere in space, any time that waves from all directions come together in just the right way just as waves might break on the surface of the ocean when random wave fronts combine just right.
Galactic central bubbles can then eject smaller bubbles by exactly the same mechanism that a radioactive atom emits a neutron or an alpha particle. As this central bubble would be spinning, bubbles could easily be ejected at the same time from opposite sides of the sphere forming a twin armed spiral disc pattern as these stars are thrown out in to space. The stars will also be spinning (not necesarily in the same plane) and eject bubbles in the star's own equatorial plane. causing all of the planets to align on the star's equatorial plane.
This explains galactic systems and stellar systems and planetary systems without the need for the magical accretion disk theory which somehow without a damping force, nor an inter particle couple, nor a force which increases with positional error manages to pull matter in to disks and then stars, planets or moons and also manages to completely clear all the space between bodies.
Please read my paper describing this new dimensional model and consider how much simpler (and more elegant) the universe is when this replaces our assumption of fundamental linear mass, length and time.
All is explained in my paper Deleted research item The research item mentioned here has been deleted
Andrew Bradford Thank you. I invite you also to read the comments of this discussion and participate with your opinion: https://www.researchgate.net/post/What_is_scientifically_undeniable_about_Blackholes
The infinitely-expanded, finite yet unbounded heliocentric lambda-CDM model of the soul-lure system is a divergence from the golden system of physical natural science and cosmology of the ancient advanced societies.
A new experiment could make a vacuum-sealed environment of 0 Kelvin but far from Gavity. The Bose-Einstein condensate could be observed for a few time. Is it the 5th form of matter?
Here is the link of the article: https://bigthink.com/hard-science/bose-einstein-condensate-in-space/
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Physical Sciences
- Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics
- Atoms