What is fundamental? (Strings or Dimensions?) What was the beginning of everything? Isn't zero (0) fundamental?
I did research about zero (0Theory) to find the origin of the universe. According to my calculations, my conclusion is that zero (0) is the start of the theory of everything: Preprint Verifying The Origin Of Everything
(A Mathematical Research About The Origin Of The Universe)I discovered a calculation that helped me to find a few mathematical interactions like elementary particles, quantum foam, etc. And Using that calculation, I have tried to explain the fundamental nature of the Planck constant, wave functions, Big Bang/symmetry breaking, Black Holes, Dark Matter/many worlds, force moments, quantum gravity, etc.
What is your answer (best theory)? or what is your reaction to the 0(Zero)Theory?
The paper of 1974 by Scherk and Schwarz, ``Dual models for Nonhadrons'',
https://inspirehep.net/literature/89538 is relevant here.
It's very easy, actually, to obtain the particles of the Standard Model from such constructions, that describe generalizations thereof: Preprint A Quadrillion Standard Models from F-theory
; the real challenge is to understand what do the additional particles represent and how they may be detected.
Stam Nicolis, did you see how I calculated the origin of elementary particles in the Standard Model and additional particles? If you didn't, please consider reading it first: Preprint Verifying The Origin Of Everything
It (0-Theory) is a simple and clear mathematical explanation, and predicts and explains the origin of a lot of things in the universe better than String Theory and M-Theory, etc.
Better means, obtaining the same known results, in a broader framework, that leads to new results that can be checked by experiment. How a result is obtained is less interesting than the result itself.
Using terms (like ghosts) out of context isn't a good idea. Ghosts don't and can't belong to the spectrum of any physical system. Assuming what's to be deduced isn't a good idea , either.
The hadronic spectrum of the Standard Model has already been obtained from lattice QCD to a very good approximation, incidentally. So that problem is, essentially, solved. It's now a benchmark for trying to understand physics beyond the Standard Model. What's a non-trivial problem is to understand the electroweak interactions beyond perturbation theory.
Stam Nicolis, Thanks for your comment and reply. I hope you will consider reading fully. The 4 great fundamental units of forms/ghosts are called ‘4 mahā bhūtā’. Bhūta (in Pali) is another name for “ghost” because of its elusive nature. I found a lot of details about paramount (‘Paramartha’) facts in Buddhism that are similar to the results of the calculation of dimensional interactions. Surprisingly, that is a kind of verification of the results as well.
Eg:
i. “The 4 Great/Fundamental units of Forms/Ghosts (Pali: ‘Catu Mahā Bhūtā’) *(5)”
ii. “The Pure Eight (‘Suddhāṭṭhaka’) *(5)”
iii. “28 Material Forms/Phenomena (‘Rūpa’) *(6)”
iv. “52 Mental Factors (‘Chetasika') *(7)”
v. “The 4 Innumerable Aeons (the 4 ‘Asaṃkhyeya Kalpas’) in The Great Aeon (‘Mahā-Kalpa’) *(8)”
vi. “The Lifetime of a ‘Matter Area’ (‘Rūpa-Kalāpa’) is equal to 17 Mind/Heart-mind (‘Chitta’) moments/conscious-moments (‘Cittakkhaṇas’), or 51 short instants (17X3 = 51); as there are 3 short instants in a moment of mind (‘Chitta’) *(9)”
I continued the calculation as a ‘differential equation’, and then I discovered 8 formations of dimensions first. But I didn’t care about it much until I heard the word ‘Suddhāṭṭhaka’ in Buddhism. In many places, I have explained the similarities between the results of the calculation and the explanations in Buddhism about the process of the universe.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Condensed Matter Physics
- Zero