HU (the Hypergeometrical Universe Theory) proposed a new model for the creation of the Universe, called The Big Pop Cosmogenesis.
Big Pop Cosmogenesis proposed that the Universe started as a Hyperspherical Metric Fluctuation, which upon partial recombination, decays into an Inner Dilation Layer and the outermost Contraction Layer.
Upon motion (at the speed of light), the Universe (Outermost Dilation) fragmented into a Blackholium (a hyperspherical hypersuperficial Black Hole). The Blackholium expanded until a phase transition into the Neutronium (neutron star density hyperspherical hypersuperficial Neutron Star).
That phase transition led to the triggering of hyperspherical harmonic acoustic oscillations. These Neutronium Acoustic Oscillations were frozen by a further reduction in density.
These frozen hyperspherical harmonic acoustic modes are what we see in the Cosmic Microwave Background.
HU uses Planck CMB observation to extract the hyperspherical harmonic acoustic modes composition.
Once one has that composition, one can calculate the density fluctuation anywhere.
The video contains the initial density fluctuation (1:100,000) that after billions of years, should create a corresponding galaxy density across ALL observable and unobservable Universe.
This means that starting from our CMB, one can create a map (based on observations of the CMB at different positions within the hyperspherical hypersuperficial Universe) that would tell you where you are anywhere where the Universe exists.
This video is less ambitious and only displays our 3D observable Universe.
I welcome any information about how this map relates to actual astronomical observations. I can recognize the great attractor from my map. I don't have enough information to know where are the voids in larger cosmological distances.
I think we should start evaluating this map by evaluating where it predicts voids.
Always remember that the distance relates to redshift z in a simple manner d(z)=z/(1+z) in a normalized universe with 14 GLY radius.
Another positive point of this theory is the fact that it predicts large structures in the Universe. Big Bang, which uses a Gaussian distribution of "quantum fluctuations" cannot predict large structures (unless they fudge somehow and they will always do).
I am in agreement with your implied conclusion that the Big Bang theory is not correct. I have found in my analysis that there are three assumptions in the Big Bang theory that have to be discarded:
1) The cosmological principle.
2) The assumption that all matter formed at the same time.
3) The explanation for the cause of the Cosmic Microwave Background radiation.
Once these assumptions are discarded there is considerable freedom to choose an evolution path with the age of the universe being much greater.
Data Prerecording of Conference Presentation on Dark Matter and Dark Energy
Richard
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Computer Science and Engineering
- Artificial Intelligence