Dear Ismail Abbas M. Abbas ,

What to do? - To look at "entanglement" with open eyes and from a completely different angle.

Namely: what is happening with the Landau levels in the discrete quantum Hall effect. And what is happening there is that at each level there are several electrons at the same time and they are all united by a single quantum of action h. This is real entanglement, when we can say nothing about each electron in the group, but only about the entire group.

Similar entanglement is observed in the fractional quantum Hall effect, when several quanta of action h belong to one electron. In this case, the electron is "divided into parts", showing a fractional charge, but for some reason we never see these fractional charges individually. Just as we cannot divide nucleons into individual quarks, no matter how hard we try.

And in macroscopic objects, seemingly behaving classically, we can detect "entanglement". We are talking about coherent structures in liquid and gas flows. These structures are coherent because the elements in it are combined in different ways into groups also by one single quantum of action h on the group. With a very large number of them throughout the entire coherent structure.

With best wishes, Dulin Mikhail.

It is necessary to recall to begin with that not every mathematical result necessarily has a physical meaning, that is, be characteristic of phenomena observed in the surrounding inanimate world. In the specific issue under discussion, Schrödinger was initially and until the end against attributing a physical meaning to entanglement, which directly follows as a mathematical consequence of the linearity of his equation and the canons of constructing wave functions of multiparticle systems. Let us also add that Schrödinger cited the famous thought experiment with a living-dead cat precisely to substantiate his (and Einstein's) approach, and not in order to interpret the meaning of entanglement using a visual example (as is very often perceived and presented today).

Entangled communication is instant. The cosmic horizon emits gravity locally from using a bit of Holographic cosmic horizon gravity to make Holographic elements of A and B correlate their spins. This shrinks the cosmic horizon by one Planck area, breaking entanglement with the cosmic horizon which causes the horizon gravity bit to emerge locally across 13.8BLY. Spooky action at a distance happens on cosmic horizons where an observer’s spin and distant observers‘ spin are Holographically encoded across the entire horizon such that you could find Holographic elements equally almost smeared across the entire observer particle‘s cosmic event horizon.

That said, the answer to Schroedinger‘s cat is that the cat is an observer. The cat is made of particles, each of which have their own unique and discrete cosmic horizon. That car’s cosmic horizons resThe cat is an observer and doesn’t rely on human observation to exist. The cat is the first to know when the vial cracks The cat is merely in a mathematical superposition.

This is a serious question that has never been answered before.

Cairo Statistical Theory of Techniques shows a rigorous way to combine classical and quantum physics!

Below we prove beyond doubt how any classical energy density (such as EM energy density, gravitational energy density, etc.) evolves spontaneously and inevitably towards an initial quantum steady state.

By quantum steady state here we mean a stationary solution at ψ^2 (ψ^2=ψ. ψ*) rather than ψ itself and in a secondary step, ψ can be found as the SQRT of the solution.

Note that the quantum vector V1 is the projection of the initial unit space of the energy density situation of classical physics which means,

V1 is a 3D spatial state quantum vector for a classical physical situation of 4D energy density.

V1 is a 1D spatial state quantum vector for a classical 2D initial physical situation, as shown in the presented figures.

Here, the starting conditions of the classical physics situation are:

Infinite free space that has neither BC nor source term.

The classic system is contained within a closed control volume with a classic inward-pointing tangle.

For more clarity, we can compare the formation and explosion of the numerous Big Bangs which are subject to the same physical process.

In the following, we present the correct answer to this question through two illustrative examples A (3D geometric shape) and B (2D geometric shape) [1].

1-Example (A) 3D-Cube discretized into 27 equidistant free nodes as shown in fig.1.

Fig,1-Cube discretized into 27 equidistant free nodes as shown in fig.1.

The statistical theory of Cairo techniques defines the transition matrix B of classical physics (27x27) for the control volume.

B(27x27) for RO=0 (RO=0 means free space) is given by,

.0 1/6   0 1/6   0   0   0   0   0 1/6   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0

1/6   0 1/6   0 1/6   0   0   0   0   0 1/6   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0

0 1/6   0   0   0 1/6   0   0   0   0   0 1/6   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0

1/6   0   0   0 1/6   0 1/6   0   0   0   0   0 1/6   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0

0 1/6   0 1/6   0 1/6   0 1/6   0   0   0   0   0 1/6   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0

0   0 1/6   0 1/6   0   0   0 1/6   0   0   0   0   0 1/6   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0

0   0   0 1/6   0   0   0 1/6   0   0   0   0   0   0   0 1/6   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0

0   0   0   0 1/6   0 1/6   0 1/6   0   0   0   0   0   0   0 1/6   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0

0   0   0   0   0 1/6   0 1/6   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0 1/6   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0

1/6   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0 1/6   0 1/6   0   0   0   0   0 1/6   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0

0 1/6   0   0   0   0   0   0   0 1/6   0 1/6   0 1/6   0   0   0   0   0 1/6   0   0   0   0   0   0   0

0   0 1/6   0   0   0   0   0   0   0 1/6   0   0   0 1/6   0   0   0   0   0 1/6   0   0   0   0   0   0

0   0   0 1/6   0   0   0   0   0 1/6   0   0   0 1/6   0 1/6   0   0   0   0   0 1/6   0   0   0   0   0

0   0   0   0 1/6   0   0   0   0   0 1/6   0 1/6   0 1/6   0 1/6   0   0   0   0   0 1/6   0   0   0   0

0   0   0   0   0 1/6   0   0   0   0   0 1/6   0 1/6   0   0   0 1/6   0   0   0   0   0 1/6   0   0   0

0   0   0   0   0   0 1/6   0   0   0   0   0 1/6   0   0   0 1/6   0   0   0   0   0   0   0 1/6   0   0

0   0   0   0   0   0   0 1/6   0   0   0   0   0 1/6   0 1/6   0 1/6   0   0   0   0   0   0   0 1/6   0

0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0 1/6   0   0   0   0   0 1/6   0 1/6   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0 1/6

0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0 1/6   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0 1/6   0 1/6   0   0   0   0   0

0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0 1/6   0   0   0   0   0   0   0 1/6   0 1/6   0 1/6   0   0   0   0

0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0 1/6   0   0   0   0   0   0   0 1/6   0   0   0 1/6   0   0   0

0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0 1/6   0   0   0   0   0 1/6   0   0   0 1/6   0 1/6   0   0

0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0 1/6   0   0   0   0   0 1/6   0 1/6   0 1/6   0 1/6   0

0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0 1/6   0   0   0   0   0 1/6   0 1/6   0   0   0 1/6

0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0 1/6   0   0   0   0   0 1/6   0   0   0 1/6   0

0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0 1/6   0   0   0   0   0 1/6   0 1/6   0 1/6

0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0   0 1/6   0   0   0   0   0 1/6   0 1/6   0

And the time-independent stationary transfer matrix D(N) for a sufficiently large time N (N is the number of iterations or time jumps dt not to be confused with n the number of free nodes) is given by:

D(N)={1/(I-B) -I}

The numerical values ​​for the inputs of D(N) are,

. . . . . . .  . . . . .Line1- 0.11217139924042430 0.39097856453321000 4.6769216489284893E-2 0.39109945997946949 9.3594337527814389E-2 2.8917725571791415E-2 4.6825121038529496E-2 2.8936273137263536E-2 1.1071538930203321E-2Lin2-  0.39245121669051708 9.3427323090059911E-2 2.8815705697913047E-2 9.4099292136797519E-2 5.7873202288345083E-2 2.2118458029200764E-2 2.9057496590432032E-2 2.2174362578445368E-2 1.0013027641488021E-2

. . .  . . . .

. . . . . . .  .

The matrix D(N) when multiplied by any classical energy density state GT zero will yield the quantum stationary state vector V1 as given below,Line14- 5.9522930308185402E-2 0.11488249791384746 5.7197832143438897E-2 0.11653613666887269 0.45840470771955916 0.11532751395682590 5.8069610117386164E-2 0.11560704495552804 5.7678086265005757E-20.12615384982071848 0.45295668203854378 0.11322885915882226 0.46218312607510498 0.28858852722237699 0.45753292974561188 0.11653613666887269 0.45840470771955916 0.115327513956825900.12138552253472995 7.5702048174876219E-2 5.0296486271624162E-2 0.12615384982071848 0.45295668203854378 0.11322885915882226 5.9522930308185402E-2 0.11488249791384747 5.7197832143438897E-2Etc . . .“To be completed with a double symmetry”

V1=[27/272 37/272 27/272 37/272 25/136 37/272 27/272 37/272 27/272 37/272 25/136 37/272 25/136 67/272 25/136 37/272 25/136 37/272 27/272 37/272 27/272 37/272 25/136 37/272 27/272 37/272 27/272}^T

Note again that:

1- Any classical physical system of energy density contained in free space will evolve towards the quantum state vector provided it is contained in a closed control volume and driven inwards towards the center of mass CM (midpoint MP)

2-From this state it evolves towards another vector depending on the applied external potential V(x,y,z,t) included in the Schrödinger equation (central potential field, finite or infinite potential well, etc.).

3- The quantum vector V1 is the projection of the initial unit space of the energy density situation of classical physics which means,

V1 is a 3D spatial state quantum vector for a classical physical situation of 4D energy density.

V1 is a 1D spatial state quantum vector for a classical 2D initial physical situation, as shown in the presented three figures.

Finally, we believe that E. Schrödinger had a deep understanding of quantum mechanics.

Only, he did not have the power to impose his own ideas against the giants of the time , N. Bohr, Heisenberg, Einstein, etc.

Check out his brilliant quotes:

I-entanglement is not one, but rather a characteristic of quantum mechanics.

ii- He declared,

“I don’t like it and I’m sorry I ever had anything to do with it.”

Today, after 100 years, we are more reliable about what is true and what is false.

1-Useless Math -The Complex Untold Story

• International Journal of Innovative Science anي Research Technology ,
• October 2024
• DOI:
• 10.38124/ijisrt/IJISRT24OCT1091

Artificial Intelligence AI can be simply defined as solving problems through automated algorithms.

In this article, we explain the basic prerequisite skills of a future AI programmer and how he can improve his abilities in the field of artificial intelligence programming.

Finally, we use AI to test the correctness of the well-known theories of relativity and quantum mechanics introduced by the giants A. Einstein and E. Schrödinger more than a century ago.

The numerical results are stunning because they show that the well-established theories of relativity and quantum mechanics are only partially true and contain inherent flaws.

It is worth mentioning that many of our respectable contributors and readers frequently ask how do you judge and correct the scientific work of the giants A. Einstein and E. Schrödinger?

Does this mean you are smarter than both of them?

The answer is that we use AI.

It is the artificial intelligence of the Cairo techniques and its B-matrix algorithms that is smarter than A. Einstein and E. Schrödinger and not the author himself.

I get it. The simple Landauer Limit explanation I came across solves GR and QM in the simplest of ways. It’s not as complicated as we led to believe. You should run it through your AI and see what it thinks.