Energy in any shape is only known thing behind every thing in natural systems. Symmetry and none symmetry are the two defined things behind Function of energy at anywhere in any form.
Dear Raja N A Khan,
Please, see my comments preceded with >>
Did/Does Nature Waste Energy...??
>> Nature is an uncontrollable consumer of energy, so the amount of energy 'wasted' is immeasurable.
Energy in any shape is only known thing behind every thing in natural systems. Symmetry and none symmetry are the two defined things behind Function of energy at anywhere in any form.
>> Sciences know much more than just energy 'behind every thing in natural systems"; Yet, I'm not certain what do you meant by symmetry/energy relationship ? Please, elaborate if you can.
Now the Question is that by any ways, in any directions, at anywhere, Nature wasted/wasting the energy in any useless or/& inefficient activities?
>> In some cases, we can partially utilize energy produced by nature, but at the same time we cannot stop nature to 'spend' energy in any direction that we may consider 'wasteful.'
How to estimate/calculate it?
>> Whatever we utilize we can assess it.
If so then what are those activities in Universe?
>> There are numerous gigantic energy transformations in the Universe. Humans on the Earth is a tiny island in the Universe, and we're only at the onset of the space exploration and exploitation.
What can be the more better utilization of energy in such activities?
>> Humans waste numerous energy resources on producing weapons and waging wars - what can be more stupid energy waste than this?
In Energy-Map of universe, what alteration you suggest and why?
>> Our knowledge of Universe isn't sufficient enough yet for such assessments.
What certain type of Energy based on its functions, you want to add up in Energy Spectrum of universe, and why?
>> I am not sure what do you mean by "type of Energy based on its functions'?
The question is wrong from the outset, as the concept of "waste" is only human.
The energy that exists in the universe is used by nature in many ways.
There is no waste, period.
Dear @len leonid, Thanks for your deep input... 1) Can you kindly guide me about any know area of science which is independent from energy?, and how science is beyond energy..... 2) symmetry is estimation of human mind in terms of drawing & numeric values for fixation of energy or product of energy. Energy itself need design for its "elements" (building elements of energy are not under discussion at current)...... 3) human knowledge understand few types of energies (kinetic, potential etc) , is there any other types possible or needed based on Further Functional Requirements (FFR)?
It is the number of people using energy that is a problem; not the lack of it.
Lou
God does nt know thriftiness. There is enough of all we need in this world. Moreover nature does not waste because the definition of wastin include senselessness. But everything nature gives has sense! The few people who think that it might be ok to rule the world tell the fairytales of havin not enogh and sametime they offer their solution... which only make sense in their mindset, not naturally!
Dear Raja N A Khan ,
You may want to look over the data I collected for you below. I hope you'll get some clear understanding of energy issues.
Part I — The Future of Energy
https://medium.com/@abhishek.pec/part-i-the-future-of-energy-9209f43359c7
_____
_____
The future of energy
Long synonymous with oil and gas, the energy industry is on a mission to expand its focus and explore new technologies. Here’s a look at what’s ahead.
https://www.businessinsider.com/sc/future-of-energy-sector-2020-12
_____
_____
What Is The Future Of Energy? 16 Experts Give Their Insights
https://www.disruptordaily.com/future-of-energy/
_____
_____
In regards to "not enough energy", there was a welknown person that once pointed out - we can not live without War; were they right?
Lou
It's simple; the more people we are - the more energy we need. With the amount of sunlight that is available in Scandianavia, for example, perhaps it is not so strange that the area was colonized directly after - and during, the Younger Dryas (last phase of the Ice Age).
Lou
If humans are included in the broader assumption of "nature", then yes, nature wastes energy.
1. The question is wrong because the nature is not a designed structure, but a sum of competing creatures. Thus there are not any defined goals or targets for the nature in general. And it is not even possible to say what part of ''energy'' is consumed on useful way.
2. Any creature is growing, moving, thinking etc by using energy in its lowest forms like a fuel. The same as an internal combustion engine does by burning the gasoline to generate mechanical energy. But the efficiency of engines and also ''engines'' is limited, no one is perfect. Remember the second law of thermodynamics. So, yes, it does waste.
3. The nature as a sum of competing creatures uses a lot of energy for competition and fighting. It leads to better species, but the efficiency is questionable. As it is in human business - the advertising is a part of competition that, in general, improves the performance. However sometimes the resources are just wasted on stupid ways. So, yes, again.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Biological Science
- Molecular Cell Biology
- Culture Cells
- Cell Line