The flipping from traditional perfect market thinking to imperfect dwarf green market thinking instead of shifting to perfect green market thinking in 2012 RIO + 20 transformed the role governments play when dealing with market failures and the way they would react when facing democratic and huma rights protest in response to the market failure,....
Which raises the currently important question:Did 2012 Rio +20 transform all governments in the Paris agreement from environmental externality policy correctors and enforcers INTO environmental externality cleaners and enforcers?. If Yes, why? If not, Why?
What do you think?
In 2012 Rio+20 conference and the Paris Agreement did represent a significant shift towards acknowledging and addressing environmental externalities, it did not instantaneously transform all governments into "environmental externality cleaners and enforcers." The degree of transformation varies from country to country based on various factors, including economic, political, and social contexts. The journey towards environmental sustainability is ongoing and dynamic, with different governments making progress at their own pace.@https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/rio20
Nzeyimana, thank you for commenting. So in your view they went from environmentally policy contractors and enforcers to environmental cleaners and enforcers, BUT slowly so now the role of governments is as environmental cleaners and enforcers.
Do you realise that means GOVERMENTS trade their duty to correct the environmental market failure for becoming environmental cleaners without any direct control on the behavior of polluting producers and consumers using society's resources to cover the cost of the cleaning up of still cost free pollution behavior?
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Agricultural Science
- Soil Science
- Soil Analysis