Dear AI & esp. AGI: THERE IS ONLY 1 Psychology _that CLEARLY _indicates some of the nature and _foundations _critical _ for abstract concepts & processing (& Dear Psychology, you may now well "owe me"; keep reading)
I provide a theory (major developmental parts yet to be researched) that provides AI and General Artificial Intelligence (AGI) with a CLEAR (concrete, usable) description of the INCEPTION of abstract thought (concepts) and abstract processing. This, needless to say, will be (is) ESSENTIAL TO AGI. (This psychology theory and techniques I describe IS THE ONLY THEORY that describes SUCH in concrete USABLE form.)
And, Dear Psychology, if you find the procedure I clearly describe and indicate (the research involving eye tracking technologies) and THAT leads to discovering basic perceptual shifts (which I also describe), THEN YOU WILL HAVE TO (at this point) acknowledge ME: IF the clearly described kind of research (eye tracking discovering the beginning basic perceptual shifts with ontogeny, and associated with developing abstract capabilities) I indicate CAN be found usable-and-useful for findings that yields the results indicated _and_ IF, IN FACT, all this IS FOUND, THEN the fact of the existence of this major foundations-finding procedure will be called, "the Jesness principle for empiricism" ** . YOU are, at this point, too late for any credit (imagine what Trump would say HERE).
** FOOTNOTE: Ironically my point of view on cognitive development is THE ONLY VIEW that would allow for continued, acknowledged EMPIRICISM (at the real-science level). Thus, I believe (if one thinks about it enough and thinks in any sort of consistent and cogent manner), what I describe must be true OR good empiricism does not work for Psychology (which I most-assuredly do NOT believe). Analytic philosophers of science and Psychology should "perk up" on this matter OR argue otherwise (without meta-physics
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Computer Science and Engineering
- Artificial Intelligence