Dear Ankur, our Universe and all objects of the Universe possess own periods of time. These periods are parts of the time of the Universe. But why we must think that our Universe is exclusive object? Our Universe is a materialization of the period (cycle) of Time, which exists out the Universe. Our Universe obtains energy of Time and transforms it into material bodies, possessing the own cycles. Every man is materialized state of the Earth's time, which is the part of the Sun's time,... When the time of the Universe will be ended, the Universe does not be a material object: it will dematerialized together with all parts: planets, stars, galaxies,... Our model of the Universe is a product of our period of Time: earlier the pictures of the Universe and future must be another, than contemporary picture. Our model corresponds the present period of Time. For example, if we consider non-static Universe, we explain the observed results as expanding of the Universe. If we consider static model of de Sitter, we obtain that acceleration is caused by more slow temp of Time near the horizon of events (the t=time is stopped at the surface of horizone). Really, the Time creates the pictures of the Universe, corresponding to our level of consciousness. So, the Time is the Cause of All in the world, and the material world is the Consequence.
Hi Larissa, sorry it took me sometime to get back.
First of all, thanks for your time and effort!
If i understood it correctly form this " our Universe and all objects of the Universe possess own periods of time. ". our universe is also periodic (other celestial bodies are also periodic) So it means we are in agreement.
Or to simplify, if i may ask to show your consent on each pointer and state the reasoning behind (of which physics laws i am not following or why these pointers are impossible to postulate).
Dear Ankur, you are right considering our Universe as period of time, and all objects of the Universe are periods of different length. The question arises: may be our Universe is the part of more great objects? Considering the Universe as a fragment of more great object (the Infinity) we obtain that our Universe is fragment of Infinity. Assuming that the structure of the Infinity is fractal, where the minimal fragment is infinitely small, we obtain that fractal Infinity exists infinitely long period of time. Then the period of our Universe is determined by outer conditions. The time of living of our Universe is a part of the fractal Infinity/ It is evidently that fractal Infinity is the Time and our material object is materialized state of corresponding fragment of Time. Every object lives until it possesses own time (time of life): if the time ends the object will be non-material substance --- the part of United Time of Infinity.
Dear Ankur, contemporary science is found on the base of material world. But earlier scientists considered material world as consequence, and non-material (energetic) world as cause. Using material base of contemporary science and considering it as with positions of non-material world we will can understand the nature of Time. It is long way, but this way will can going.
Dear Ankur, science must be found on experimental dates. Cosmology also is found on observable dates. There exist results which are not considered in science i principle because they contradict to contemporary theories. These new results are: 1) observable dates obtained by astronomer N. Kozyrev (researcher of Time) where was shown that momentary interaction between observer and stars, other galaxy (Andromeda Nebula) are possible: 2) Biophysicist Shnoll shoved that the time possesses fractal structure for any intervals: 3) Academician Morozov proved that sources in constellation Carina acts on weather. I think, these results must be uzed for new picture of the world. Information about these results is on my website http://www.geocities.ws/borissova/