This is a good idea. A rotating hyperspheres with space-like and time-like fifth coordinates are considered in https://arxiv.org/abs/1111.0001 . 

The theory was made public in 2006.

http://hypergeometricaluniverse.com/blog/archive/2006/6/

I considered explaining the Pioneer anomaly through the curvature of the hypersphere. I wrote and rewrote the calculation. Eventually I realized that I could explain only half of the acceleration.  Explaining half is the same as explaining nothing from my point of view, so I dropped the Pioneer Anomaly from my main theory. There is always a chance that I made a mistake and missed a factor of two somewhere..:)

http://hypergeometricaluniverse.com/blog/the-pioneer-anomaly/

Below is the first official publication of my theory.  My hyperspherical Universe doesn't rotate, but travels at the speed of light.  I also provided a mechanism for achieving that velocity.

https://www.amazon.com/Quantization-Astrophysics-Brownian-Motion-Supersymmetry-ebook/dp/B0010XII2S/ref=sr_1_fkmr1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1493498274&sr=8-1-fkmr1&keywords=quantization+in+large

I don't consider this idea a reasonable idea any more and took it off from future presentations of my article.

There is a reason. I explained the Spiral Rotation Curve Conundrum without the need of Dark Matter.

The lightspeed expanding hyperspherical topology provides a new constraint's force, I called the Hypergeometrical Force.

This force is just equal to mvc/R_0 where R_0 is the 4D radius of the Universe.

Below are the simple derivation of the force.

It explains both high rotating velocity galaxies as well as slow ones.

####################################

In addition, my theory had already corrected the Law of Gravitation to be epoch-dependent and velocity-dependent. This means that the Stellar Candles hypothesis can and should be challenged. Its adoption is what led us to absurd distances and Universe expansion.

Once corrected the distances, HU PREDICTS all SN1a distances without a single parameter.

####################################

The extra force allows for extra (unaccounted for) hydrogen clouds to be in orbit around each galaxy. This explains bullet clusters.

IN SUMMARY

Despite of considering the existence of an extra antimatter hypersphere, I later realized that that was a mistake and unnecessary for explaining OBSERVATIONS.. I don't see any sign they are required.

You propose a parallel universe from antimatter which can be a candidate for the dark matter. In any case, at the big bang from a quantum fluctuation an anti-universe with antimatter can have arisen quite, which makes itself noticeable by gravity in the matter-universe. From the energy balance it would be a perfect solution.

I would like to look at your video to it: https://issuu.com/marcopereira11/docs/huarticle

However, it is blocked. Could you give me an access?

Best thanks Helmuth

The question is loaded because of the particular circumstances under which my theory has been created.

I found better explanations and also dropped that as the leading candidate for Dark Matter. I found that DM and DE are not needed at all.

Follow here to understand about the Inner Dilation Layer (IDL) which I called Lagging Hyperspherical Hypersurface here.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jHK-Lyb7NfM

###################################3

My work has been censored since 2006.

Los Alamos Archives does not allow me to post it there even though the work has been peer-reviewed and published, and I provide endorsers.

That is an example. Other journals will not publish me because:

26-May-2016

Manuscript ID: aag2130

Dear Dr. Pereira:

Thank you for submitting your manuscript "The Hypergeometrical Universe Theory" to Science. Unfortunately, this is not the sort of work that we publish and we are thus not considering it for publication. We appreciate your interest in Science.

Sincerely,

Monica Bradford Managing Editor

or because:

Dear Dr. Pereira,

Thank you very much for having submitted your manuscript entitled :

"Hypergeometrical Universe Theory Supernovae High Z Predictions"

to Astronomy and Astrophysics.

I regret to inform you that your manuscript cannot be considered for publication in Astronomy and Astrophysics because we do not publish articles that are not authored by members of astronomical research institutes.

Sincerely,

Thierry Forveille A&A Editor in Chief

Preprint.com doesn't allow me to deposit it in a preprint repository...>:)

I believe it is because I showed that Einstein's equations does not describe the Universe (same as FLRW does not describe the Universe).

So, because those unseemingly obstacles (lack of intellectual honesty by scientists), I resorted to present my ideas through LOADED QUESTIONS.

I am sure you will understand it.

If not, just let me know what your objection is.

By the way, had I received an argument here, it is possible I would have learned about my mistake on the SDSS data analysis.

I retracted that analysis. So, the "many banging" is not part of my model anymore. That was an artifact of CMASS data collection protocol in the SDSS group.

So, my theory included an incorrect argument. That said, peer review could have revealed that to my benefit and to the benefit of Science.

This is the new Hypergeometrical Universe Cosmogenesis- The Big Pop Cosmogenesis:

The Big Pop Cosmogenesis - replacement to the Big Bang

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jHK-Lyb7NfM

Big Pop Article

https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202201.0106/v1

Wladimir Belayev

Rotating hyperspheres do not seem to be a good idea. They beg the question: Why are these hyperspheres rotating?

What about angular momentum conservation? How would Coriolis force in 5D affect our connection to the hypersphere hypersurface? etc.

Marco Pereira

The motion of a particle in a rotating hypersphere was considered. Article Spherical field in rotating space in 5D

I have no evidence that such a model corresponds to reality. It follows from it that our three-dimensional world is only a visible projection of the world of large dimensions and parallel three-dimensional volumes do not have any obstacles for the movement of material particles through them. By the way, the compensation of the additional acceleration in 3d that occurs in this case can be an explanation for the increased speed of rotation of stars around the center of galaxies, which is explained by the existence of dark matter.

Wladimir Belayev

Why is the hypersphere rotating? Does that offend the law of angular momentum conservation?

How would you react if Einstein's equations were not capable of describing the Universe? Would this paper still be valid?

Marco Pereira

Similarly, one might ask why the electron has a spin. If there were an answer to this question, then it would be possible to establish why the hypersphere rotates. In the embeded 4d space-time, the observed radial momentum will obviously not be conserved.

Electrons have spin because they live in a 4D spatial manifold and that is one of their degrees of freedom. The summation of all spins should be zero.

In other words, one can explain why electrons have spin without disobeying the law of conservation of angular momentum.

I don't deal with the geodesics model, and thus, I don't use spacetime.

I could benefit from your explanation of what do you mean by:

Observed Radial Momentum of Spacetime

By the way, you might want to watch a short video and read a short paper:

The Big Pop Cosmogenesis - replacement to the Big Bang

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jHK-Lyb7NfM

Big Pop Article

https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202201.0106/v1

Such that we establish a common language.

Cheers,

Marco