To fight the disease effectively, researchers from across the scientific spectrum and beyond must join forces.
Yes and more so, interdisciplinary collaboration (Pharmacology, Chemistry, Biology, immunology, medicine, statistics, etc...)
Of course Dr Abdallah!
It is a complicated serious illness that is both awkward and obscure!
Amended on 20 April 2018
Yest, it is.
However, physician sometimes ignores or dismisses the opinion of biochemist (please see files; Rat DEN Np-Fuco and Feed by Measure).
By the way, I have previously collaborated with a physician, who takes immunological method (ELISA method) for granted. But, he has finally agreed that the HPLC-photometric method uniquely gives the true result (please see file; JCB Fucoidan transport).
Immunology is of immense clinical importance in the fight against cancer
Very true, collaboration across disciplines and geographical locations.
Without collaboration a research can't be accomplished. Sometimes, is really difficult, but necessary.
Yes, sharing new knowledge / findings / treatment is important key for better care for patients. The cancer related issues are discussing in "Cancer board " for each week among Oncologists to discuss about their patients issues - the plan for treatment, cause for co morbidity or metastasis or unknown mortality ! Definetly collaborative research will give better results!
I agree. We must stop this global plaque of cancer that is spreading without any control
Without collaboration, a research project can't be performed. each scientist has a specific field.
Surely, collaboration with a quantitative analytical method is important.
Therefore, HPLC method is the only method to collaboration.
Maldi-Tof-MS, ELISA, RI, MRI, CT, NMR, and direct-use of photometer are all not the qunatitative method giving no contribution to the medicine.
Just as cancer diagnosis and management require multidisciplinary approach, research into aetiology, pathogens is, complications, appropriate management and prevention require multidisciplinary approach and collaboration.
Cancer is a very complicated pathology! is manifesting very differently through patients disorders, the causes are various:
To fight cancer first it is necessary to understand this obscure world, and therefore it is necessary to develop divers specialities such as: medicine; biophysique; biochemistry; biotechnology; nutrition; environnemental-chemistry; which try to work in collaboration in order to advance in the field of cancerology!!!!
I agree with Dr. Salwa Bouabdallah (University of Carthage, Carthage, Tunisia) that Nutrition is an important issue (please see file; Anticancer Res). Excess of nutrition unexpectedly causes many infections by virus, bacteria and fungi.
Liver cancer is simply caused by the co-infection of HCV and HIV-1 (please see file; The Fascio effect).
Therefore, virology and research in the infectious disease are also important in cancer research.
Progress isn't merely from standing on the shoulders of giants. It's standing shoulder to shoulder with giants. In my experience young investigators with good funding are the most exciting collaborators.
Progress isn't merely from standing on the shoulders of giants. It's standing shoulder to shoulder with giants. In my experience young investigators with good funding are the most exciting collaborators.
Cancer research is an interdisciplinary enterprise. This need a narrow collaboration between different laboratories- Moreover translational research in this field is of paramount importance and is one of the key of success for therapy (cell therapy , immunotherapy and other)-
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Medicine