Hi there,

I've collected data through a survey in which we asked participants to rate behaviours on a couple of dimensions (e.g. effectiveness of engaging in the behaviour). Specifically, each participant rated 3 of 20 behaviours which we randomly allocated so that each of the 20 behaviours has 50 (different) participant ratings. The data set I received back is a lot richer and more complex than I had anticipated.

The challenge I believe I have is that there are participant clusters (the same participant rating three different behaviours). Additionally, I wonder whether I should also include behaviour fixed effects, for example when looking at the effectiveness aggregated across all of the 20 behaviours?

For reference, two of the questions I am trying to answer are the following:

1. I would like to use t-tests to compare groups of people (e.g. participants identifying as men vs. those identifying as women) against one another and see if they rate the behaviours overall (in aggregate) differently (e.g. more or less effective).

2. I would like to run a regression to understand how people judge the behaviours (i.e. which factors matter).

Hoping the above makes sense and someone might be able to point me in the right direction. If there is anything I can clarify further I'd be more than happy to do so.

Many thanks!

More Juliane Schittek's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions