Showing the positive sides of already happening climate change mitigation strategies may lead to a better feeling, probably reinforcing positive feedback loops. Or does it foster the status quo in the sense that all is good and there is no need to change anymore?

On the other side, doomers picture doomism, which may show how important it is to promote drastic change and be prepared for new ways. May it lead on the contrary to fatalism and low energy?

What does climate anxiety recommend for each of the different Sinus Milieus? Picturing doomism or painting the bright mitigation picture. Which means are more appropriate for drastic changes instead of small steps.

More Thomas Schuermann's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions