Dear colleagues

I am organizing a Special Issue entitled “Oxidative stress, classification and quantitation” in the Antioxidants (IF 4.52; ISSN 2076-3921, http://www.mdpi.com/journal/antioxidants).

The Special Issue aims to expand our understanding and perspective on all aspects of redox status, its evaluation, homeostasis related adaptation and oxidative damage and repair

https://www.mdpi.com/journal/antioxidants/special_issues/

. I am particularly interested in your view on the apparent controversy regarding the use of the term Oxidative Stress and the more recently defined terms "Distress" and "Eustress".

In addition, the use of these terms relates to the possibility of quantitating OS. The problem is that the OS, as evaluated by the use of different biomarkers do not correlate with each other, namely, OS cannot be quantitated by a universal criterion and it depends on the biomarker used to evaluate it. Three complementary specific questions are:

(i) Should the term "Oxidative Stress" be re-defined to relate to more specific conditions than the original definition (Acute situations? Diseases? What else ? )

(ii) What term should we use to describe (if at all) imbalance between pro-oxidative and antioxidative components of a system ?.

(iii) Why should we quantitate “Oxidative Stress” (Is there any reason to try “to quantitate OS”?).

If you wish your answer to be publish in the special issue, please let me know

Looking forward to your replays

Dov

More Dov Lichtenberg's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions