The lack of a comprehensive seed classification may be due to the lack of accurate descriptions of seed shape. We have recently open the project entitled:
I did some digging here in the UK, and Kew have a project on this also - http://www.kew.org/science-research-data/directory/projects/A-Dictionary-of-Fruit-and-Seed-Morphological-Terms.htm
Kew also have a seed information database which holds information about storage qualities, as well as other traits particularly focussing on conservation activities: http://data.kew.org/sid/sidsearch.html
These sections are called “benches”in the terminology of Research Gate. The idea is to collect accurate (geometrical) description of seeds. Then to open a new bench for each group (family, genus,species…) for which a description is made. Benches entitled “Seed shape in Arabidopsis” and “Seed shape in model legumes” are now filled with our recent articles published in Journal of Plant Physiol and open to discussion. You may contribute either discussing these, giving new data with the description of shape in other groups (families, genera, species,…), or suggesting ideas in the benches called Classification of Seeds and Morphological description of seeds.
I believe Agnieszka is already a participant in the project. I could not enter the invitation for Jonathan because the Research Gate platform did not recognize your name (the only Jonathan Moore it recognizes at the moment is in Virginia), but I will try again and in the meantime you may also try by your own. If this does not work in a couple of dayswe may contact the Research Gate Staff.
Dear Dr. Emilo...I am also trapped in the same situation like the appropriate terminolgy for the seed shapes...as I AM ALSO WORKING ON THE SEEDS of one of the plant group....if u got something ,,u please suggest me...in the meantime i ll look for something which may helpfull to us...and ll inform u if i ll get something....
I work on seeds from the Mediterranean area, especially endemic species from Sicily. I have lots of data on gross morphology and micromorpholgy too (i.e SEM analysis). If you think that my contribution to your project could be useful, I would appreciate knowing something more
Thanks for your interest. At the moment the project collects publications, data and questions from individuals or groups that may be interested in this subject. Today Gianfranco Venora added several publications. I could not yet open all of them but i managed to open some in his personal page in Research Gate. I suppose you may know him as well as their publications. Please have a look at the project pages and upload there your articles:
On this issue I am a devout "Kelvinist." Lord Kelvin stated that verbal description is "the beginning of knowledge" which is never complete or accurate without measurement -- objective, accurate quantification. Morphometric study, available, accessible and cost-effecdtive, is always superiority in precision and accuracy to nomenclature, although this observation seems to threaten seed specialists. My colleagues and i have a data base of some 2 to 3 million measurements of seed size and shape representing populations of varying sample size from more than 1100 taxa. This required the work of two people and eight weeks, more or less, to assemble and years to realize the importance -- and inadequacy -- of what we created. Nomenclature is a journalistic convenience but it is a very poor basis for systematic analysis.