No

No

There is a good news too. Gravity waves were predicted by general relativity and therefore do not need additional explanation. 

I am a little bit too smart tonight, but the word explain really annoys me. Describe, model. 

But, why should these gravity waves be a quantum mechanical phenomenon? As far as I understood they are a macroscopic phenomenon.

In the same way, for describing how an antenna emits waves, you don't need the Schrodinger equation, but Maxwell's equations.

No. 

“I am the first who understood and explained the Gravitation with high speed gravitons   v = 1.001762 × 1017 m/s, with Negative Momentum, Negative Mass and Negative Energy” Adrian Ferent

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/294087093_Ferent_Gravitation_theory

Kåre Olaussen,

Why No? 

Yes we can, and in this case photon mediates gravitation. I think we discussed too much about that. The consequence of that:

1- The universe is Static and Euclidean, and there is no big bang. See this RG https://www.researchgate.net/post/Universe_is_static_Yes_or_no2

2- There is no graviton, it is only photon!!

3- There is no dark matter and dark energy, they are only fake. They are proposed only to fix data with GR.

All the problems in physics from Higgs to Galaxies are solved 

Dear Ramchandra Pageni

Now Review my paper http://vixra.org/abs/1509.0059

Also review these RGS

https://www.researchgate.net/post/What_is_reason_at_the_base_of_the_time_dilation_of_the_atomic_clocks#56cb99575f7f71b54c8b4567

https://www.researchgate.net/post/How_are_Lorentz_invariant_equations_invariant_for_all_observers

https://www.researchgate.net/post/Is_Loretnz_symmetry_conserved_for_all_velocity_ranges

https://www.researchgate.net/post/Is_the_Schiffs_conjecture_affected_by_serious_issues2

https://www.researchgate.net/post/Why_didnt_QM_and_gravitation_merge_yet

https://www.researchgate.net/post/The_gravitational_redshift_is_a_phenomenon_based_on_gravitational_time_dilation_dont_we_want_to_exclude_definitely_any_loss_of_energy_of_photons

https://www.researchgate.net/post/Is_it_not_better_to_find_an_operating_definition_of_non_inertiality_just_provided_by_detecting_accelerations_than_to_define_inertiality

https://www.researchgate.net/post/Aether_field_rejected_by_Michelson_Morley_experiment_in_20th_century_but_now_in_21st_century_Higgs_field_is_accepted_Why_is_that

https://www.researchgate.net/post/Can_somebody_clarify_on_the_results_of_the_Hafele_and_Keating_experiment

Primordial gravitational waves were supposed to be created when the universe was 10-43 second old. In comparison, primordial neutrinos started free streaming when the universe was 1 second old, and primordial photons of CMBR started free streaming when the universe was 100,000 years old. Therefore, (in principle) the problem of the creation of primordial gravitational waves has to be addressed by a quantum theory. But unfortunately we do not know the exact theory of quantum gravity. There was a lot of excitement recently, when a pattern of polarization was detected in anisotropy of CMBR as then it was thought that the cause was of a primordial origin. In practice this was not the case; and later it was reinterpreted to be an effect related to interstellar dust.

Gravity Waves discovered? NOPE, Simplex Electromagnetic Phase Rarefaction/Retardation

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=srVlo1Ez5fk

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=srVlo1Ez5fk

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J3Hoax81rkI

 Answer is No, but gravity wave can be explained by Schrodinger like quantum gravity equation discussed in following article. Formula 68 can generate many many graviton like particles. One example is given in Table 5, data no. 27.

Article Periodic quantum gravity and cosmology