As stated by Strömbäck (2008), the analysis of mediatization as a process of four phases, is mainly restricted to Western democracies in the period after World War II.

Hjarvard (2008) also maintaines that "Mediatization is no universal process that characterizes all societies. It is primarily a development that has accelerated particularly in the last years of the twentieth century in modern, highly industrialized, and chiefly western societies, i.e., Europe, USA, Japan, Australia and so forth. As globalization progresses, more and more regions and cultures will be affected by mediatization, but there may be considerable differences in the influence mediatization exerts". 

So trying to make use of the theory's innovations and four dimensions in analysing the media's role in the current civil wars in the Middle East, with its authoritarian regimes, lack of democracy, and media for an extent to act as part of this chaos, is a real challenge. Can mediatization apply for such type of analysis? Primarily, how can we measure in an academic work, the degrees to which media is independent from the political institution?

More Hussein Alahmad's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions