Can truth ever hurt? Must it hurt?
Yes it can, if you have taken a contrary theoretical-philosophic-scientific position that you are willing to defend with your life and with your own take on the subject, having fallen in love with your own hypothesis, without concern for its evolution.
This is my last question/discussion on the subject of migraine and will contain all my publications or their links, past or future. There are many veils of falsehood in migraine research and many levels of truth -- hence the hurting phenomenon.
While truth is a single-version dispassionate bliss-of-intuition, for those who have invested a lifetime in its pursuit, getting caught on the wrong foot is as good as being guillotined. Admitting error is like being guillotined by the hour.
How do you know that you are hurting?
IF
If you cannot sustain a fair dialogue
if you cannot balance without tripping
if you seek straws to exit the discussion
if silence or evasion gives you solace
if the research grant has gutted your
courage, and pithed your spinal cord
if real appears empirical, to you, and
if real appears empirical
if the grace of numbers clouds your vision
if you are betrothed to mesmerizing statistics
if you are lost in the woods of knowledge
if you are bewitched by the airy castles of print
if you know not the value of each tree
or shrub, in the wood of wisdom and the
breeze of intuition, and the Ocean, the Wind
pass by you, unnoticed, and communicate not
if you know not the value of foundations
if your heart warms to the applause of the herd
if you not the value of self-criticism, nor the
curbing of over-enthusiasm and restraint
you are set to hurt, no fear.
Now or in the future, no if.
This post will also contain some of my choice quotes from my publications, including my book.