Can the physical reality be represented mathematically?
Well actual physics, can be represented mathematically with the Basic Systemic Unit, based on Euler’s relation with its most remarkable property of remaining the same in spite of change, that permits to deduce the fundamental equations of physics such as :
* that of the pendulum a real harmonic oscillator
* that of the gravitational field including that of the planet mercury obtained by Einstein, but in this case obtained with a mathematical tool no so much complicated as was done with Tensor Analysis
* those of SR in another approach, in which linear moving is just a special case of the more general solution obtained with the BSU concept in which covariance is included as it is a consequence of the isomorphic property of Euler’s relation mentioned above and finally the
* Schrödinger’s wave equation
For those interested in the way all this is obtained you can see my papers:
QUANTUM PHYSICS
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/384190006_Quantum_Physics (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/384190006_Quantum_Physics)
A QUANTUM THEORY OF GRAVITATION
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/385592651_A_Quantum_Theory_of_GravitationNewpdf (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/385592651_A_Quantum_Theory_of_GravitationNewpdf)
SPECIAL RELATIVITY WITH ANOTHER APPROACH
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/382357270_Special_Relativity_Another_Approach (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/382357270_Special_Relativity_Another_Approach)
that I really hope will contribute to overcome the great crisis of physics, because the great incompatibility between QM and GR.
So yes, actual physics, can be represented mathematically in a real coherent way, but for it is necessary to make a real paradigm shift.
Edgar Paternina
retired electrical engineer
But the question is for example, why then there is such a crisis of physics, represented in great incompatibility between GR, based on Tensor Analysis a mathematical tool based just in real numbers and in which time is reduced just to another variable of the same characteristic as space, i.e., symmetric, and QM based on complex numbers, with which time is clearly differentiated from space, as in in it, the part affected by the symbol "i"= sqr(-1) has to do with Space and is affected by the Sine that has two solutions
Sine(Theta) = Sine(Theta)
Sine(-Theta) = -Sine(Theta)
while that part not affected by "i", or else Time is affected by the Cosine function that has just one solution
Cos(Theta) = Cos(Theta)
Cos(-Theta) = Cos(Theta)
so depending on the mathematics used, we will obtain quite different representations of reality, that is exactly my main concern.
Best Regards
Edgar
Dear Edgar Paternina ,
Thank you for sending your question. From what you wrote, I think you are right.
The article is translated into English:
Article Fizikailag-metafizikailag bizonyítható a graviton létezése
I haven't uploaded it yet, but if you're interested I'll send it to you.
In China, a simple experiment was conducted that confirms what was imagined. The following video was made before the experiments were conducted:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gp0jPTsZ4Bc
And there are more things that could be done.
Regards,
Laszlo
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Mathematical Sciences
- Graphs