When culturing bacteria and comparing two conditions—one with a specific substrate and one without—transcriptomic studies can indicate which proteins play a role in the metabolic pathway of the available substrate. However, I am curious if the absence of a substrate could also lead to the upregulation of genes relevant to the metabolic pathway associated with the missing substrate.

For example, consider two conditions: Condition A lacks substrate A but has substrate B, leading to a shortage of substrate XY. As a result, a protein (let's call it protein C) is involved in overcoming this shortage or regenerating/producing substrate XY, and therefore is highly expressed, even though substrate A is absent, which is ultimately necessary to produce the limited substrate XY. Thus, the transcriptomic study would show an upregulation of the gene encoding protein C for the condition where substrate B is present. However, protein C plays a crucial role in the metabolic pathway of substrate A, not substrate B.

Is this a scenario that could possibly occur, or is it unlikely? I understand that in science, it's difficult to say "never." Please provide scientific arguments for why this might or might not be the case.

More Stefanie Becker's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions