When culturing bacteria and comparing two conditions—one with a specific substrate and one without—transcriptomic studies can indicate which proteins play a role in the metabolic pathway of the available substrate. However, I am curious if the absence of a substrate could also lead to the upregulation of genes relevant to the metabolic pathway associated with the missing substrate.
For example, consider two conditions: Condition A lacks substrate A but has substrate B, leading to a shortage of substrate XY. As a result, a protein (let's call it protein C) is involved in overcoming this shortage or regenerating/producing substrate XY, and therefore is highly expressed, even though substrate A is absent, which is ultimately necessary to produce the limited substrate XY. Thus, the transcriptomic study would show an upregulation of the gene encoding protein C for the condition where substrate B is present. However, protein C plays a crucial role in the metabolic pathway of substrate A, not substrate B.
Is this a scenario that could possibly occur, or is it unlikely? I understand that in science, it's difficult to say "never." Please provide scientific arguments for why this might or might not be the case.