Dear Meysam,

You may follow this link:

http://www.mycobank.org/BioloMICS.aspx?Link=T&TableKey=14682616000000067&Rec=21074&Fields=All

In the the description section there are three links which may be helpful to you for literature search.

Best Wishes,

P

Dear Prakash 

Thanks, your link done useful for me.

Regards. 

Dear Mehrdad

Thanks for your answer.

Regards.

Easy to identify! Look for the brown artrospores resembling Alternaria conidia.

I am so happy every time somebody uses microscopical morphology to identify asexual fungi! Cheap and quick! No always need for DNA sequencing

Sympathize with Nunez's suggestion even if Dr.Khatami sounds quite correct.Research sustainability should induce to use the simplest (and cheapest) protocol wherever the target of diagnosis is not of vital importance: anyway a not too old review of Phomaceae

could be found on the "Atlas of Clinical Fungi "by Hoog, G. S. de; Guarro, J.; Gené, J.; Figueras, M. J., ISBN 90-70351-43-9. Boerema, too, wrote a "Phoma identification manual: Differentiation of (223) specific and infra-specific taxa in culture"edited by CABI.2004, ISBN 0851997430.

Regards

Dear Maria

Thanks, i agree, no always need for DNA sequencing, DNA analysis is 

complementary for many of fungi identification.

Dear Claudio

Thanks for your answer.

Best Regards.