Dear samaneh,

Its almost a general error in time dependent quantum methods and depends on your input job file.Can i have your input files or at least more description?

General cause of this error is discussed in ccl.net.

http://www.ccl.net/cca/archived-messages/10/04/03

Best

Dear samaneh,

Its almost a general error in time dependent quantum methods and depends on your input job file.Can i have your input files or at least more description?

General cause of this error is discussed in ccl.net.

http://www.ccl.net/cca/archived-messages/10/04/03

Best

Dear Hamed Haghshenas sir,

 I also got the same error messege during excited state calculation in solvent in G09. My input was # td b3lyp/6-31g(d) scrf=(solvent=methanol). please help me I'm new in this field.

Dear samaneh,

Please mention the keywords that you have used in the Route section. I hope it will help me to answer your question.

Dear samaneh,

do you managed to solve your problem with the l914 error?

Dear samaneh,

Error termination in l914.exe followed by "NIJ> Max2 in MMCore" failure message is usually related to the memory allocation bug for large systems in gaussian revision B and earlier. Fortunately this problem has been solved in gaussian revision C.

http://www.gaussian.com/g_tech/rel_notes.pdf

All the Best

HHA

Please use the new version,  l914 error can be avoided.

Recently, I also bumped into the same problem; this is how I resolved it,

Error "No map to state **, you need to resolve more vectors" messages.

This error implies that you didn't add sufficient excited states in the TDDFT or CIS calculation. The "nstates=N" option in the "TD" or "CIS" keywords indicates how many excited states to enter in an excited state energy calculation. If this is not defined, the default value will be "States=3". The prescribed value is to include at least of 2 or 3 more states than the state of concern. Hence, if you want to achieve a geometry optimization for excited state 5, for instance, use at least using "nstates=7" or "nstates=8". The excited state geometry optimization will follow smoothly.

#Input before the error for Optimizing the Excited states:

opt td=(nstates=5,root=1) b3lyp/6-31+g(d,p) geom=connectivity

#Input after correcting the error:

opt td=(nstates=10,root=1) b3lyp/6-31+g(d,p) geom=connectivity

Thank You.

I had a similar problem when calculating electronic spectra in the Gaussian09 version A. The problem was solved when the calculation was performed using the Gaussian09 - version D.

Samaneh Bagheri novir

You need to increase the number of Nstates. I'm pretty sure that this will work.

All the best!

Mohsin Yousuf Lone , in my case it didn't work.

Dear Mikhail S. Fedorov, which version of Gaussian you are using?

Mohsin Yousuf Lone , versions A and D, I mentioned this in the comment above.

Mikhail S. Fedorov,

Oops haven't gone through your earlier comment. I have resolved the same error by increasing the number of Nstates in version D only.

Mohsin Yousuf Lone

I am also facing same error termination. How to fix the problem? Thanks in advance

Symmetry not used in FoFCou.

CalDSu exits because no D1Ps are significant.

DSYEVD-2 returned Info= 11 IAlg= 4 N= 12 NDim= 12 NE2= 200658471 trying DSYEV.

DSYEV returned Info= 11 IAlg= 2 N= 12 NDim= 12 NE2= 200658471.

Diagonalization in DiagDN failed.

Error termination via Lnk1e in /home/ntrip/soft/g16/l914.exe at Thu Apr 24 22:22:12 2014.

Job cpu time: 1 days 13 hours 55 minutes 50.3 seconds.

Elapsed time: 0 days 2 hours 6 minutes 42.7 seconds.

File lengths (MBytes): RWF= 1577 Int= 0 D2E= 0 Chk= 11 Scr= 1

Manzoor Hussain could you please let me know the route section of your job?

#p opt td rbvp86 geom=connectivity scf=(xqc,maxcycle=700) tzvp IOp(8/11=1)

Manzoor Hussain which excited you are targeting? And could you please tell me the package you are using?