I think workers using low symmetry crystals have noted inconsistencies between supposedly identical SEM/EBSD systems, regarding the real world/sample system and the orientation of the EBSD patterns. It seems like the work was an extension of the '

Tutorial: Crystal orientations and EBSD — Or which way is up?' paper on this topic by Britton et al, in Materials Characterization, Volume 117, July 2016, Pages 113-126 .

I found this work last week, but now I am struggling to locate it now. I think it was a poster paper at a conference.

Similar questions and discussions