Dear Dr. Kayode Asaju,

"... every problem or issue of life that is not scientifically proved is not valid and correct." is an oxymoron and meaningless statement. Science is not solving problems and issues of life - science is researching for new knowledge. That knowledge is a foundation that can be used to either solve problems and issues of life, or to create them. Often, both things are happening concurrently, as any positive solution may bring expected or unexpected negative consequences.

Engineers and technologists, for instance, are developing practical solutions to solve problems and issues of life. What they are doing is called Applied Sciences, which is not equivalent to Sciences. Humans have already achieved a lot in developing Sciences. However, it is far from being a final knowledge. Scientists believe a great deal more knowledge is going to be discovered yet. Therefore, it is not like every problem or issue of life can be fully resolved as of yet or ever. Nobody knows where are the boundaries of sciences.

Some problems or issues of life do not need any scientific prove to be recognized as valid and correct. For instance, a lack of medical personnel in the local hospital, or no medical facilities close by, or an obsolete town infrastructure. However, elevating those problem or issues of life from a local to much larger scale would require some application sciences studies indeed.

Amended on 18 October 2018

This is an interesting question to me.

I was surprized that purified human serum biotinidase is a sialyrated glycoprotein (N-glycosylated) unlike bacterial biotinidase. Human breast milk biotinidase (O-glycosylated), human urine/kidney biotinidase (O-glycosylated), porcine cerebrum biotinidase, guinea pig liver biotinidase, porcine brain lipoamidase, human milk lipoamidase, and guinea pig liver lipoamidase are all glyco-proteins.

Further, I was surprized that chicken avidin is a binding protein for Thioctic acid (Lipoic acid), Biotin (Vitamin H), and Amino acids. I do not regretfully know that humans has avidin gene or not; i.e., NCBI database (National Center for Biotechnology Information, Bethesda, MD, USA) does not have any human avidin gene. It is interesting that only reptiles and birds, which lay eggs with eggshell, have avidin. This is due to the battle of reptiles and birds against invading virus and bacteria (please see The Fascio effect).

I was surprized that brain biotinidase and brain lipoamidase enzymes from pigs unexpectedly have multiple affinity characteristics as compared to liver and kidney enzymes (please see file; Multiple Hydrolase LIP).

I was also very surprized that fucoidan (sulphated poly-L-fucose; unique product by brown algae Mozuku; Mr 200,000) is actively transported and excreted into urine without any digestion in humans (please see file; JCB Fucoidan transport).

Therefore, notorious Central Dogma may be an false hypothesis in humans.

Organ cells of humans seem to perform or to work in order to help or devote the whole human body.

Thus, I have recently published an article through many hardships that Japanese edible Fucoidan and Mozuku of Noto Peninsula is surely an anticancer drug/foodstuff against the liver cancer of humans and rat (please see file; Rat DEN Np-Fuco).

Further, I have surprized that human cells are composed of 80% own human genes and 20% virus and bacteria genes. Thus, human diseases are mostly caused these invaded microbes (please see file; Feed by Measure). Furthermore, this finding indicates that reborns for 7-times is necessary in order to erase the informations/DNA/RNA of invaded microbes. Thus, the statement by Indian Philosopher Gautama Buddha and Italian Philosopher Giordano Bruno is surely right.

Therefore, we biochemists can gradually find the new answers from the nature or living things by using the quantitative HPLC-photometric method.

By the way, HPLC-photometric determination method is uniquely quantitative to give us the true results. HPLC-MS, MS, direct-utilization of photometer, ELISA, PCR, Flow cytometry, CT, MRI, and Western blot are all non quantitative methods, which lead us to the false conclusions.

It is true that Science made us civilized and saves us from many catastrophic disease condition. Hence, science is one kind of solution to ease your life. Nevertheles, Science still can not explain many unanswered question. There is something which you can explain by your belief in Almighty or God, according to my opinion.

Science still at the moment can't answer to all questions. But, if there is still no scientific explanation and the topic is worth that there will be a group/groups of scientists that will try to find the answer.

Regards

GB

No capital No. people exist within an organization and therefore their thinking and perceptions can not lend itself to practical testable observation. In view of this science can not provide solutions to all problem.

I think yes ,science can provide solution to every problems .

Dear, Mr. Shather,

Can you shed more light on why you said science can provide solution to every problem?

I do not think, Science can not solve all the problems of life, there is the side of, physical, metaphysical, psychic, religions, feelings, prediction of the future, the visible, the invisible, the existence of other creatures, the moral, the principles, the values, angels, jinns, etc ....

No

our knowledge is always limited and science and scientist could not explain everything in the life and so could not give the answers

I do not think so, science cannot answer every question, unless it goes hand in hand with religion and vice versa

No, especially about love

No. Science is powerful, but not omnipotent.

Pease, see my comments preceded your questions with >>

Can science provide answers to every questions?

_____

>> No, it can provide only such answers that can be confirmed through scientific experiments.

_____

or Can science provide solution to every problems or issues of life?

_____

>> No, it can't, because there are reasonable and unreasonable humans' demands to sciences. Sciences care only about reasonable ones, that can be probed, tested experimentally.

_____

Question 14 answers

There is that current and popular thinking and trend in research that every problem or issue of life that is not scientifically proved is not valid and correct.

_____

>> It is not true a priori, but chances are that it may turned out to be incorrect indeed.

_____

So, should every academic research be scientifically incline? what is your opinion?

_____

>> If there is a need for verifiable objective results - yes, it should.

If science can provide answers to every questions it means end of science and all problems are solved.