JCPDS or ICDD data entries are available only if you buy a the data base. On the other hand, you can export single entries and send them to other people. JCPDS or ICDD has its strong points for data identification, i.e. you need a retrieve software which uses the experimental peak positions in order to find a satisfying match with a single or more phases. In so far a single phase description does not help you. Moreover, the descriptions are mainly based on experimental measurement with all sources of errors. The crystal structure as major component of the peak intensities is not considered or even unknown.
COD is a free-available data collection of crystal structures, i.e. you now know all atom positions and you can calculate the respective intensity for any radiation, diffraction geometry, texture etc. Therefore, these data are more reliable that JCPDS data. Unfortunately, the determination of the lattice parameters is less accurate. This means, the Bragg angles might show higher differences to your experiment than JCPDS data show. But usually this is not a big deal since also JCPDS data for the same phase displays differences in lattice parameters and so in Bragg angles.
Conclusion: Since you do not have a search or retrieve software which automatically identifies the phases from a database, single JCPDS data are useless. It is commonly better to apply crystals structure data since they definitely result in correct reflex intensities. Small deviations in lattice parameters do not disturb that much. Each software is able to adapt the small differences which is not so easy/suitable/trustful for the reflex intensities. However, it means that you need to compare your phase manually. Only in case when the expected phase is not described by a crystal structure, JCPDS data are the only data you have. Then it is better than nothing!
Just a small clarification of Shekhar Nath's correct answer: As implicit in his response, JCPDS (The Joint Committeed on Powder Diffraction Standards) is now called ICDD (International Centre for Diffraction Data) - same organization and data, but new name; and of course the "cards" are no longer physical cards.
this is crystal structures open database, you can download (for free) cif files and then you can use mercury to plot structure models and save reflection list and xrd calculated pattern
Where can I find an online resource to get XRD JCPDS files?. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/post/Where_can_I_find_an_online_resource_to_get_XRD_JCPDS_files [accessed Aug 23, 2017].
JCPDS or ICDD data entries are available only if you buy a the data base. On the other hand, you can export single entries and send them to other people. JCPDS or ICDD has its strong points for data identification, i.e. you need a retrieve software which uses the experimental peak positions in order to find a satisfying match with a single or more phases. In so far a single phase description does not help you. Moreover, the descriptions are mainly based on experimental measurement with all sources of errors. The crystal structure as major component of the peak intensities is not considered or even unknown.
COD is a free-available data collection of crystal structures, i.e. you now know all atom positions and you can calculate the respective intensity for any radiation, diffraction geometry, texture etc. Therefore, these data are more reliable that JCPDS data. Unfortunately, the determination of the lattice parameters is less accurate. This means, the Bragg angles might show higher differences to your experiment than JCPDS data show. But usually this is not a big deal since also JCPDS data for the same phase displays differences in lattice parameters and so in Bragg angles.
Conclusion: Since you do not have a search or retrieve software which automatically identifies the phases from a database, single JCPDS data are useless. It is commonly better to apply crystals structure data since they definitely result in correct reflex intensities. Small deviations in lattice parameters do not disturb that much. Each software is able to adapt the small differences which is not so easy/suitable/trustful for the reflex intensities. However, it means that you need to compare your phase manually. Only in case when the expected phase is not described by a crystal structure, JCPDS data are the only data you have. Then it is better than nothing!
Two points of clarification on the PDF database from ICDD (formerly JCPDS).
I must disagree with part of what Gert Nolze says, "COD ... [has] all atom positions and you can calculate the respective intensity for any radiation, diffraction geometry, texture etc. Therefore, these data are more reliable that JCPDS data."
While, it is true that COD data has atom positions, it is not true that PDF cards do not. Many PDF cards do have atom positions and full crystal structures.
Even if it were true that one had atom postions and the other did not, that would imply that one data set or the other was more reliable! In fact the set of PDF cartd in the ICDD data base is the only database with quality marks. Every card has an indication of the data quality. With COD you do not know the data quality of any card unless you read the original publication of the card, and run a set of consistency checks, and have lots of experience. For example low quality marks result from having unindexed peaks in the original data.
Disclaimer, the company I work for is a PDF reseller. But we do not make any money on it!
I have to admit that new ICDD data bases implemented crystal structure data and used them like "measured" data. They would not use them if they would be less reliable. On the other hand, in crystal structure data bases also the quality of data is voted in remark lines. It might be that this is not done in COD since it is not a commercial data base and for such voting you need a lot of time an special background knowledge, in other words, money. And even then one can only say that there is some indication for mistakes. But also the quality mark in ICDD is only an indication. Otherwise...they would delete obviously bad entries since why they should puzzle people with erroneous data sets? From my point of view this only means that they also don't know it really (how they should?)...and don't want carry this resposibility.
Anyway, COD is for free, and everyone should be always consider that any data base contains erroneous entries. This also no commercial software or data base will exclude.
For XRD data analysis you can used the most popular software such as X'pert high score. It is more feasible and easy to identify the crystal planes as well as crystal structure of given material.
To Dr. Basanta Kumar Parida, I have opened the site mentioned by you. You can download the file by right-clik on [txt] on the left of he card title, and then click on "open link in new tab"
Please, can anybody send me the PDF file of chromia (Cr2O3), containing the complete set of d(hkl) as determined by XRD ? I am working at home and all I need is the list of d(hkl) of Cr2O3 in order to compare these values with those recorded by electron diffraction. I have no paid access (lack of financial resources) to the JCPDF database. Many thanks in advance !
I have no idea why do you need it? Why you don't use the crystal structure data and use a software which simulates the diffractogram? This is commonly more useful than an ICCD card where you cannot be sure whether it contains "artifacts" coming from the experiment.
ICDD (formerly JCPDS) pattern are taken from experimental powder patterns. It isn't straighforward to simulate texture, peak broadening and other effects basing on COD data.
Anyway it seems that at Library Genesis they got the whole set (libgen.is)
Not sure if it is the last one, should be PDF2, but in form of plain text. An index is also enclosed
All - if you are so interested in having "a copy of the JCPDS files" then please go to the ICDD website and buy a license for the database. It is not free software and cannot legally be shared (if any of you have done any sort of online search, you should know this information already). You are asking your colleagues to violate international copyright laws. Please stop doing this!
If you all were to order legal copies of this database, the increased revenue might even allow ICDD to lower the price, which would be awesome for everyone.