Bi-directional shortening of muscle and the direction of eukaryotic cell crawling are both dependent on the polar nature of microfilaments or microtubules. It is ultimately the filament ploarity that determines the direction, either through biased polymerization or their motor proteins. Most myosins are (+) end directed, just as most kinesins are (-) end directed, and in vivo one typically sees preferential growth of actin filaments and microtubules from their (+) ends.

Can anyone think of a counter-example? Is there a system where the motor sets the ultimate direction of cell movement rather than the filament polarity? Perhaps a system where the filaments are of random polarity yet directional motion still occurs.

More William Harold Guilford's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions