We want to conduct a systematic review of in vitro studies which assessed the effect of homeopathic medicines on cytokine induction in macrophages culture.
You have to measure the bias and exclude poor ones
There are many tools to measure it
Striving for high standards of methodological quality should be coupled with similar rigor for reporting the results of research in the literature. Research should be reported accurately, thoroughly, and transparently. Reporting quality is distinct from methodological quality but the two concepts overlap in a number of ways. Thorough reporting helps in the assessment of the methodological quality of a study. For instance, including only statistically significant results in a research paper is an example of both poor reporting and a risk of bias . Consequently, an appraisal of both methodological and reporting quality is essential to ensure that accurate information is derived from published research.
Strict inclusion and exclusion criteria is the best way to avoid bias. Make it clear you are using animal or human studies if human then certain disease specifically infected individual must be excluded as WBC count is already disturbed . So choose studies of the same inclusion criteria and exclusion criteria to save potential bias.
To date, there is no standard RoB tool to assess the methodological quality of the in-vitro study. However, you can assess methodological studies by strictly following previously published studies. And, you should keep in mind that you have adopted/modify some of the parameters with previously published studies because your eligibility criteria may no be the same.
For your convenience:
1. Article Calcium homeostasis and low-frequency magnetic and electric ...
2. Article In Vitro Antimicrobial Effectiveness of Root Canal Sealers a...
Quin Tool has been designed specifically for conducting quality assesment / risk of Bias assesment of in vitro studies.
The tool is very easy to use and interpret the results.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022391322003456
Quin Tool has been designed specifically for conducting quality assesment / risk of Bias assesment of in vitro studies.
The tool is very easy to use and interpret the results.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022391322003456
Quin Tool has been designed specifically for conducting quality assesment / risk of Bias assesment of in vitro studies.
The tool is very easy to use and interpret the results.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022391322003456
Quin Tool has been designed specifically for conducting quality assesment / risk of Bias assesment of in vitro studies.
The tool is very easy to use and interpret the results.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022391322003456
Quin Tool has been designed specifically for conducting quality assesment / risk of Bias assesment of in vitro studies.
The tool is very easy to use and interpret the results.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022391322003456
Quin Tool has been designed specifically for conducting quality assesment / risk of Bias assesment of in vitro studies.
The tool is very easy to use and interpret the results.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022391322003456
Quin Tool has been designed specifically for conducting quality assesment / risk of Bias assesment of in vitro studies.
The tool is very easy to use and interpret the results.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022391322003456
Quin Tool has been designed specifically for conducting quality assesment / risk of Bias assesment of in vitro studies.
The tool is very easy to use and interpret the results.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0022391322003456
1. ToxRTool (Article "ToxRTool", a new tool to assess the reliability of toxicological data
)2. The US National Toxicology Program developed a risk of bias tool to assess in vitro exposure studies that was used as a case example in a systematic review of PFOA and PFOS immunotoxicity (In attachment).
1. ToxRTool (Article "ToxRTool", a new tool to assess the reliability of toxicological data
)2. The US National Toxicology Program developed a risk of bias tool to assess in vitro exposure studies that was used as a case example in a systematic review of PFOA and PFOS immunotoxicity (In attachment).
1. ToxRTool (Article "ToxRTool", a new tool to assess the reliability of toxicological data
)2. The US National Toxicology Program developed a risk of bias tool to assess in vitro exposure studies that was used as a case example in a systematic review of PFOA and PFOS immunotoxicity (In attachment).
1. ToxRTool (Article "ToxRTool", a new tool to assess the reliability of toxicological data
)2. The US National Toxicology Program developed a risk of bias tool to assess in vitro exposure studies that was used as a case example in a systematic review of PFOA and PFOS immunotoxicity (In attachment).
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Social Science
- Media
- Journalism