Emails from journals received by researchers who are clearly not in the field(s) the journal covers
Scholars included on the editorial board without their knowledge or permission (not Yosemite Sam, though this would apply to him too)
Promise of rapid publication and/or unusually quick peer review (less than four weeks)
No policies for digital preservation
The same article appears in more than one journal
Are you asking because you received one of their emails? I highly suggest ignoring them and publishing in a more mainstream journal. To an extent, the quality of the journal you publish can determine how others view your work, as it implies a certain level of professional vetting and approval.
I am not in total agreement with Kathleen Connolly criteria for identifying predatory journals. For instance, that a particular journal reviewed and publish a paper within or less than 4 weeks does not make it a predatory journal (PJ).
It is time, the so called quality journals speed up the timing of their review and publication processes of their journals.
Sometimes they unnecessarily waste time without any just course.
Concerning AJBSR i check the web page and noticed that it is relatively new still in volume 1. This may not make it a predatory Journal. I suggest you make proper finding.
The only surprising thing therein is that the Journal already had over 50 reviewers.
It is good to know from Derek Pyne that it is already a blacklisted journal on Cabell's list. However, it is important to also inform that there are high quality and impact factor journals with RESEARCH as part of their names and that does not make them predatroy. For instance, Account of Chemical Research, Circulatory Research, Nucleic Acid Research, Clinical Cancer Research, Journal of Business Research, International Journal of Educational Research just to mention a few.