This case is important from a clinical point of view. Karyotype was normal. Advanced genetic tests were not conducted due to unavailability of such tests in the state as well as financial concerns.
A subclinical case would be a case that does not show clinical symptoms of the syndrome..... .
I guess that's not what you ment. You have a patient with the typical clinical signs of a rare syndrome? And there is no confirmation of the diagnosis by a molecular test, because such an analysis is not available?
Sure you could publish the case, if it is indeed interesting. Maybe you can find a collaborator who has some funds available for testing? That would most likely make it a lot better.
Would you like to elaborate, what syndrome we are talking about here?
Yes Sir. By Subclinical case, I meant lack of expression of the typical phenotypic defects of the syndrome. Rather the case had got unnoticed & hence undiagnosed untill histopathologist showed some peculiar findings, which lead to recall & thorough re-examination of the patient. The clinical diagnosis was a diagnosis of exclusion based on thorough review of literature. It was a clinically diagnosed as a sporadic case of OFDS type 1.