19 March 2016 6 1K Report

In his 1970 article "Social processes and spatial form: An analysis of the conceptual problems of urban planning", (from book: Social Justice and the City) David Harvey discusses the two lens (sociology and geography) for analyzing city problems, arguing that the gap has not been bridged between them. Essentially, accusing urban analyses to resort either to "space-less social science" or "space-centered geography". 

Is this still true? If not, what leading frameworks can I seek to explore the bridging of this gap between the said theoretical perspectives of the urban?

More Ali Adil's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions