The major apprehension of genetic engineering is that through recombinant DNA experiments , unique micro-organisms or viruses (either inadvertently, or sometimes deliberately for the purpose of war) may be developed that would cause epidemics and environmental catastrophes. Are these fears unfounded? Don't you think the benefits or potential benefits of genetic manipulation outweigh the downsides?
Varieties obtained by genetic engineering are as dangerous or safe as varieties created by mating or mutations are, at least this's what scientifics have proved to date. Mostly of genetic modifications used commercially occur in nature and not represent a danger by theyself. The correct management of resources is important to preserve the environment and, at the same time, provide food for human beings. Probably the unequal distribution of food in the world is more dangerous that genetic modification of crops.
Most technologies can have both positive and negative outcomes, just because there is a potential negative doesn't mean you should stop using it. It all depends upon how it is used. A car is great for transportation but can also be used maliciously or be involved in an accident. That doesn't mean one should stop driving, that just means one should be careful about driving.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Biological Science
- Bioscience
- Biotechnology