In modern scientific forums, how can we ensure that ideas, data, or products are examined through a truly holistic lens—evaluating both strengths and limitations, identifying biases or propaganda, and encouraging creative and novel approaches? How can we promote open and lateral thinking alongside rigorous evidence-based analysis, while balancing skepticism with receptivity? What strategies can cultivate a scientific culture where multiple perspectives are integrated to reach the most balanced and innovative conclusions?
Your question shows a strong way of thinking about how scientific discourse should be. I think you should start by stating your viewpoint and then ask the question. This is key because the notions of truth, reality, knowledge, and discourse depend on the context, field and perspective. I agree with you that in some instances, such as education, there should be a consideration of the multiple ways a research problem is conceptualized and addressed. Priorities can be different. Considering multiple perspectives with appropriate conceptual/theoretical support and evidence, so a person/student can make informed decisions. Lastly, what is a "truly holistic lens"? Often, it is better to remove adjectives and adverbs to eliminate unfounded opinion and open the door to arguments.
- Badges
- Science topic