Laws are supposedly based on broad principles, doctrine, ideas to legalize oppression, tyranny, exploitation, expropriation, confiscation, war, genocide, and plundering of natural resources to further a political agenda and legal rules focus on the technicalities to justify all the above mentioned actions.
In some contexts, "law" and "legal rule" could be used synonymously. However, I will venture a distinction: The "law" is the concrete norm, established by the legislator and the concrete legislative process to regulate certain behaviors, create powers or institutions, or define specific procedures. On the other hand, "legal rule" could be a concept that transcends the concrete and specific character of "law" and is situated as the general context in which a "law" makes sense within a "legal system". In practice, when creating, interpreting, or applying a "law", there are certain principles that everyone takes for granted: They are conventions that are not explicitly enunciated in the concrete text of a "law", or even in the constitutional text on which the set of laws is based. They can be identified when, when limiting the scope of a norm, or when interpreting its meaning, it is necessary to appeal to abstract concepts obtained from the "legal doctrine", or from the "general principles of law".
I apologize in advance if my answer can't be answered or isn't quite right 🙏🏻, The terms "law" and "legal rule" are closely related but can be distinguished based on their scope and meaning. Here's an overview of the difference between the two:
Law:
Law refers to a system of rules and regulations that are created and enforced by a governing authority, such as a legislature, judiciary, or administrative body. Laws are designed to govern and regulate various aspects of society, including individuals, businesses, and organizations. Laws can be created at the local, regional, national, or international level, depending on the jurisdiction.
Laws are generally more comprehensive and encompass a wide range of legal principles, rights, duties, procedures, and sanctions. They are typically enacted through a formal legislative process and are often codified in written statutes or regulations. Laws are binding and have the force of authority within a specific jurisdiction. They serve as the foundation for maintaining order, resolving disputes, protecting rights, and promoting justice in society.
Legal Rule:
A legal rule, on the other hand, refers to a specific principle or provision within the broader framework of the law. It is a specific directive or requirement that guides behavior or governs a particular situation within the legal system. Legal rules can be derived from statutes, regulations, judicial decisions, or legal precedents.
Legal rules are narrower in scope compared to the entire body of law. They provide specific guidelines and standards that individuals, organizations, or institutions must follow to comply with the law. Legal rules can cover various areas, such as criminal law, contract law, tort law, constitutional law, and administrative law. They are essential for interpreting and applying the law to specific cases or scenarios.
In summary, law encompasses the entire legal system, consisting of a set of rules and principles, while legal rules are specific provisions or directives within the legal framework that govern particular situations or conduct. Legal rules are subsets of the law and provide detailed guidance for compliance and enforcement.
Published in 1850, Frédéric Bastiat a French legislator expressed the following about the law in his book entitled The Law (La Loi, French)
“The law perverted! And the police powers of the state perverted along with it! The law, I say, not only turned from its proper purpose but made to follow an entirely contrary purpose! The law became the weapon of every kind of greed! Instead of checking crime, the law itself guilty of the evils it is supposed to punish!”
The legal rulings that make up the Islamic Sharia are provisions that God Almighty put in place on a permanent basis and not temporary to regulate people’s affairs, which are represented in the Holy Qur’an. As for the legal rule, it is temporary rules set by man to organize affairs and meet their needs. They are late rules and require change whenever the condition of the group changes.
The legal rulings do not include any benefit for the one who instituted them, because the one who instituted these rulings is independent of the worlds, but rather he legislated the rulings to achieve their interests in the first place. They are the interests, so legal rulings are a means to achieve legitimate interests, and legal rules are a means to achieve the goals of their legislators.
Legal rule is specific and narrow in its technicalities applications while law is broader and more binding.
Rule of law simply a law where is applicable to all mankind. It can be said a natural law on another perspectives,
However, laws are applicable in accordance to the origin of law making body which they are bound with but not subjected to other countries.
For examples English common law can be used by the courts judgement in Most commonwealth countries where the applicable jurisdiction is said to be a lex loci
I think the question should be more complete and detailed, in order to provide the necessary context for a comprehensive answer. For instance, is the question related to the difference between the rule of law and the rule by law? Is the question related to the moral and ethical limits of the laws and legal rules, in general? Could the question be related to the several historical concepts of the legal system? Or even, could the question be related to the difference between hard law and soft law, in the sense that legal rules could eventually be created outside the traditional concept of law?
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Philosophy
- Ethics