Values can be divided into autotelic and relative.
Relative is one that is valuable because of its usefulness, usefulness. Those that are not valuable for "reasons" are autotelsic. I would prefer not to take this a priori, but a man can be both valuable "because of" and autotelally. Usually the values "because of", are said to be mercantile. How to justify that man is an autotelian value, regardless of Kantowski norm ?
If human beings are intrinsically valuable by virtue of their creation in the image of God, then they have autotelic value. Whatever their particular skills and gifts are render them relatively valuable in those areas.
Relationships are so much more complex that one can not treat a man only because of himself, and it often happens that he is treated as a means of buying a ticket, which does not exclude that I may be nice to you. shopkeepers.
Of God, of interefere from panton kreaton metron. But this is dignity, not formalize in some system of value relationschips. Maybe We make mistake formalize relationships, but when we dont formalize it we are intuitionist. Intuitionis did not broke any rules and maybe we should feel it. What with Hobbes ? If I can why I could not do it ? Rat race ?
Absurd can only be seen from the perspective of a certain normative system that does not agree with it. That is, behavior Y is unacceptable from the perspective of a U based on the Z system. The value system refers to the image of the world or what we consider knowledge as the order of interpersonal relations. Society is a law-set. I'm looking for a law that would be a compromise for everyone. For the time being, I do not ask about the jurisdiction system, in which we would claim compensation or redress.
The principle of ahimsa may be such a rule, but in order not to hurt I must have knowledge of the other person. It is relative to the person.Its outcome would be a compromise in terms of law in respect of proceedings against the other taking into account his freedom from. Because from the perspective of freedom from and not to be compatible with the principle of ahimsa.
Alternatively, do not enter into a relationship for which we experience distress. Again, I do not agree with my idea of good, because medicine is not always good and science is painful.
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Philosophy
- Philosophy Of Science
- Reasoning