At this point I will wait for a sign that you can "handle" it. I have provided sufficient guidance to the 1000 pages of essays, doing all can. You may put questions here (under this Discussion), and IFF I feel there some clear indication that you have tried as you should and as you might, I might try (or try again) to provide guidance. BUT, at the very least: FINISH EVERYTHING FIRST. Lastly, for now: the key essential HINTS:
(1) DEFINE NOTHING FOR YOURSELF and LET NO ONE ELSE/ NOTHING ELSE DEFINE ANYTHING FOR YOU (with the "exception", noted next). In short, INSTEAD, COMPLETELY:
Count on the SUBJECT MATTER (JUST count ON all observations OR QUITE POSSIBLE OBSERVATIONS) for ALL PERSPECTIVE, ETC. AND FOR any further perspective or understandings needed, at this point, and for _____ALL____ fundamental understandings -- including FOR THE DEFINITIONS OF EVERYTHING: terms, perspective, concept-terms or ANY hint of a "model".
(2) Be VERY OPEN MINDED: JUST look to observations AND possible observations to "see" (you can only imagine that there will be patterns therein -- and I indicate the most likely). And count on NOTHING ELSE (anything and everything else you need should follow from that). ACCEPT EVERYTHING POSSIBLE AND/OR INDEED-POSSIBLE FROM THAT REALM, aka from Reality (sequential .phenomenology).
The Method noted under my Profile (and under Research) will not hurt and may help.
Anxious to get "the ball rolling", I offer possible fame if one be my editor and fortune if one defeats me
Anxious to get "the ball rolling", I offer possible fame if one be my editor and fortune if one defeats me. (So one way or another: a studious one should not lose.) The details can be found via this link to a Discussion .
https://www.researchgate.net/post/Editor_Co-author_of_my_Collected_Essays_on_behavioral_science_Needed_its_on_ethology_ontogeny_developmental_psychology_and_general_psychology ,
and my "Answer" posts under the Question,
https://www.researchgate.net/post/Why_is_there_a_weak_interest_in_qualitative_research_among_researchers
In 1000 pages of essays , I provide a clear outline, and almost a road map, for the perspective and approach (all justified, explained, explicated and compared to what is done presently, and with the necessary alternatives) needed for discovery of KEY behavior patterns, central and basic to (the foundation of) all the best understandings of "behavior". Through the direct observation of overt phenomena (behavior patterns), we CAN see all the KEY overt patterns (and the patterning of patterns, etc.) needed to understand behavior as well as I believe we can. In a "nutshell" : This is ALL done through disciplined, coordinated, direct observation of overt behavior patterns.
I have found a "cure" for a pervasively "sick" Psychology (ineffectual, stuck, non-progressing and, presently, with NO hope of getting out of this "slew of despond") . In other words, I do believe I have found a major "cure" for a serious "disease" that now completely and overwhelming pervades Psychology ( the field was similarly "possessed" throughout its whole history -- we are essentially not worse and maybe a bit better, but for sure not better by much and any improvements do not yet matter much if at all for the overall "picture" (I'd say: not better at all, unless we keep learning something good from the series of grave mistakes -- which I can't see; the learning will come only with a new thorough and strictly empirical perspective and that's what I provide) ).
**** And, I have put my money where my mouth is (see the post to which this is a Comment). ****
All you need is to be free, from being put it or having to be in a "box", and then have the freedom of thought to fully re-assess and come to a perspective and approach to discover the correct (much closer to actual) basics and bases of all major behavior patterns of interest. It is ONLY SUCH A FREE PERSON THAT CAN SAVE PSYCHOLOGY. My try is good, and thorough, and detailed ( to the point of testable hypotheses). Psychology can be the science of behavior PER SE, and being so, be a science onto itself (and every bit as strictly empirical as any of the recognized good sciences).
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Computer Science and Engineering
- Artificial Intelligence