Please let me know, some important ideas and suggestions, to fine tune my research paper writing, in order to meet high quality expectations of SCI indexed journals like "Nature Materials".
Ebenezer - it's a bit of a tricky scenario here for early career researchers(ECRs). Personally, if I sense that an article I am reviewing is from an 'emerging' researcher then I am inclined to be a little more 'forgiving'. For instance, it's often quite easy to spot if an article is based on a dissertation thesis - and the author may even declare that. That is a choice to make though. You could indicate yourself as an ECR - such as the study is part of a new project/team with emerging researchers. Not everyone will make concessions for that though. The other choice is to craft your article in such a 'confident' way that the reviewer would not expect you as an ECR. The main advice that I would give is study your targeted journal carefully. ECRs are more likely to make multiple errors because they are 'learning the trade'. Follow the scope of the journal carefully as well as the author guidelines. The less manuscript submission mistakes - the more likely that the reviewer will not suspect you as an ECR.
The attached article on 'general' hints and tips for ECRs disseminating research findings may be of some use.