Beall's list has disappeared due to harassment received by the author.
But....
I have found a 2017 archival listing of Beall's list of possible predatory journals. It is at the attached link.
If you are happy to see this site, please "recommend" so others will see it also.
https://clinicallibrarian.wordpress.com/2017/01/23/bealls-list-of-predatory-publishers/
Edit: Here is another version, which seems to be making updates:
http://beallslist.weebly.com/
People interested in an update on predatory journals, following the cessation of Beall's List updates and it's removal, might like to refer to an article in today's Times Higher Education (6 April 2017, pp. 42 & 43), reporting work by Larissa Shamseer and David Moher (link below but access may be restricted to subscribers).
Their study resulted in a list of 13 warning signs:
1. The scope of interest includes non-biomedical subjects alongside biomedical topics, or multiple, wide-ranging and unrelated fields of study are combined
2. The website contains spelling and grammar errors
3, Images are distorted/fuzzy, intended to look like something they are not, or are unauthorised
4.The home page language targets authors rather than readers
5, The Index Copernicus Value is promoted on the website
6. Description of the manuscript handling process is lacking
7. Manuscripts are requested to be submitted via email
8. Rapid publication is promised
9. There is no retraction policy
10. Information on whether and how journal content will be digitally preserved Is absent
11. The article processing/publication charge is very low (eg,
While the original Beall's list web site (scholarly-oa.com) does not host the list anymore anyway, I have recently come across a web site
https://predatoryjournals.com/
which claims to build on and expand the Beall's list (see https://predatoryjournals.com/about/ ).
See also the related question
https://www.researchgate.net/post/A_new_site_listing_predatory_journals_What_do_you_think_of_it
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Academic Journals