Follow the link below to understand the discussion subject:
https://www.quora.com/What-was-Richard-Feynmans-IQ/answer/Marco-Pereira-1
I showed that the Hypergeometrical Universe Topology ALONE is enough to explain Spiral Galaxy Rotation Curves and everything else that requires Dark Matter.
https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-status-as-of-2019-of-the-search-for-dark-matter/answer/Marco-Pereira-1
This is a trivial problem and has been solved already
The links below contain the argument that I am trying to present.
It starts with the realization that A Lightspeed Expanding Hyperspherical Universe IS NOT a solution (meaningful solution) of Einstein's equations.
Somehow, this initial first step is extremely difficult for me to convey. I cannot understand why. That said, I explained what I was going to explain in a scientific dialog, in the text on the links.
Please fee free to review the links and please confirm that HU Topology is NOT a meaningful solution to Einstein's equations. That shouldn't be difficult.
#############################################
Be the first Human Being to Understand HU - Part ONE
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/first-human-being-understand-hu-part-one-marco-pereira/
Be the first Human Being to Understand HU - Part TWO
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/first-human-being-understand-hu-part-two-marco-pereira/
Marco Pereira's answer to Does the hypergeometrical universe satisfy Einstein's GR and SR tests?
https://www.quora.com/Does-the-hypergeometrical-universe-satisfy-Einsteins-GR-and-SR-tests/answer/Marco-Pereira-1
Marco Pereira's answer to What is the status (as of 2019) of the search for dark matter?
https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-status-as-of-2019-of-the-search-for-dark-matter/answer/Marco-Pereira-1
Dear Stefan Rüster
The links are about refuting General Relativity.
My theory parameterlessly predicts all Supernova Cosmology Projects SN1a distances. GR cannot do that. You can see the predictions attached.
My theory also explained the Flat or any shape Rotation Curves of Spiral Galaxies.
If you are happy to be able to explain flat rotation curves with you Newtonian Physics model, you would be happier if you could explain linearly ascending (as it is the case of M33), and any other profile.
I showed that the Hyperspherical Topology creates an extra acceleration, thus modifying Newtonian Dynamics. Since it is an acceleration and not a force, it allows for different degrees of Loaded Matter. This permits all kinds of rotation curve profiles.
Observations are not consistent with just Flat Rotation Curves. I refer to you the M33 Spiral Galaxy (the most famous one)
So, if you are happy explaining flat rotation curves, you are missing all the fun.
Read my articles in researchgate. They explain ALL cases of Rotation curves with reasonable loading mass profiles. I also explained the Coma Cluster, Bullet Cluster and did so, without imaging a different Gravitation. Just the topology is enough.
2018:The Case for the 4th Spatial Dimension and the Hypergeometrical Force
2018: The Coma Cluster, Bullet Cluster and Weak Gravitational Lensing
Feel free to ask questions.
This post is obviously a bait and snatch when the answers provided bear no relation to the question posed.
I still try ...
What benefit does the author of the question see in the size of the brain? Whether there is a proven correlation between head size and brain size, direct measurement is not always possible ...
A big head and little wit (English proverb).
Modern medicine makes extensive use of implants ... Maybe in this case it will help also?
Vadim S. Gorshkov
Some people cannot recognize a joke when they see one. There is even a happy face on th question!!!
If you read inside, you will realize the existence of an argument that "no human brain" can understand, according to an " astrophysicist"
Alan F Rawle
It is not a bait and switch.
This wording is exactly the wording for Viagra commercials. There is a happy face on the question
If you cannot see that, it just means you have a healthy sexual life or are too old to remember to take your pills..:)
The question inside is a complex argument that most people will not be able to understand. Something worthy of discussion.
That said, it is my fault that i didn't eliminated the automatically added keywords (Brain) and because of that I ended up wasting your precious time. I apologize for that.
I am happy for your Gioacchino de Candia ..:)
I hope you can forgive me for having a sense of humor. It surprised me that people would be upset that the question wouldn't tell them how to increase their Brain size..:)
- Badges
- Science topic