You can find my new article if you're interested "A New Axiom of Irrational Numbers and Its Relations to Fermat’s Last Theory and Beal’s Conjuncture"
Comments are welcome
sinan ibaguner
Research A New Axiom of Irrational Numbers and Its Relations to Ferma...
Thank you Dr. Sinan Ibaguner for sharing your research findings. Theory of irrational numbers will be interesting and may be helpful in many other research areas. Hope that your article will be significant in that sense.
That brought me memories. Once in high school I had a small talk with someone about one mathematical problem. For solving it, the conversational partner jokingly suggested: "Let's assume it as an axiom".
"The New Axiom of Irrationality" doesn't hold for for R=0. Obviously need to change the condition to 0
Reply to Mr.Valdemārs Plociņš (Researcher)
Any kind of proof of any theorem will imply that theorem finally if correct. I admit that mathematically you are quite smart. Your explanation is directly from my MPFF & trigonometry & my axiom of irrationality. You just use trigonometry algebraically due to reading my right angle model. Are there any other Pythagoras or cos^2+sin^2=1, since there is a trigonometric proof that ( cos^n + sin^n ) can't be 1 under any circumstances therefore at least we have to assume that Fermat knew this much trigonometry therefore why Fermat claimed such an obvious thing? Why so many people got crazy to find proof ? I found the trigonometric logic, nobody wrote as I did in more than 350 years.
Can anybody in the world claim and prove that what I claim as an axiom is any other definition mathematically? According to trigonometry what I've said is true so why should I have to prove otherwise ? In fact with your writings you confirm my trigonometric model works at all levels. Thank you for you comments. BEST REGARDS Sinan Ibaguner
Sorry for long delay, and sorry for not clearly stating what's wrong in your article.
As I sais above, your "axiom" is wrong. The statement of it allows to use R=0.
R1/n=01/n=0, so it's a rational number. (1-R)1/N=(1-0)1/N=11/N=1, also a rational number - a contradiction to "axiom". However, by restricting 0
- Badges
- Science topic
- Similar topics
- Composition Studies
- Articles