đź’¬ Description (Thread Body):

In some Central European medical schools, students with “FM” (repeating course registration) or “CV” (visiting student) status face unclear rules about access to practical components like dissection labs, clinical skills, or laboratory seminars.

I am currently involved in a legal and whistleblower case in Hungary (Ombudsman Case No. EBF–AJBH–309–2025), in which I was denied access to mandatory dissection labs for months, despite:

  • Holding valid FM/CV status
  • Being fully registered in the university system (Neptun)
  • Paying full international tuition fees
  • Receiving no formal exclusion notice from the official university policy manual (SZMSZ)

The justification given was that FM/CV students must “revoke their signature” and re-earn access, yet no policy clause or legal basis supports this action.

Key Research Questions:

  • Has any other Hungarian or Central European medical university (e.g., in PĂ©cs, Debrecen, Szeged, Poznan, Cluj, or Prague) documented similar treatment of FM/CV students?
  • Are FM/CV students ever excluded from required practicals despite valid registration and tuition?
  • Are there legal precedents, published student complaints, or academic publications describing similar cases?
  • What regulatory protections (national or EU law) apply to students under FM/CV status when access to practical coursework is denied?

This is part of a larger inquiry into transparency and equal treatment in European medical education. Any insights from faculty, legal experts, or students who have experienced or documented similar practices would be greatly appreciated

More Siddhartha Harsh Wardhan's questions See All
Similar questions and discussions